STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Mate Csanad <csanad AT bnl.gov>]

Dear Zhi,

Thanks for the new version and for carefully responding to all points raised.

There are two minor format issues:

- for slides 2-5, please add STAR logo to the header (maybe also QM logo, in the 
opposite upper corners)

- still for slides 2-5, please also add your name (without institute) in the 
footer

One more issue is with the plots on slide 4. As you say that this is really 
data, especially the right hand side plot, then this should be made preliminary, 
by adding:
* collision system, collision energy (and maybe centrality)
* STAR preliminary
or there is a specific reason not to do so? Maybe this issue was discussed in 
the CF PWG? If so, then of course I am okay with it. But normally, I would think 
that all physics data plots should have these labels.

Also, on slide 2, I think every momentum could be in the PRF (anyway, left side 
of the first equation is already in PRF), and then there is no need for a STAR; 
it is not clear in what frame p_a and p_b (without '*') are - probably lab 
frame, but of course can be any frame. Or the first equation could start as 
C(p_a,p_b). But this is really minor, I am okay leaving the entire box as it is.

Thanks,
Mate


2022. 04. 04. 20:37 keltezéssel, Q Z írta:
> Dear Mate,
>
>
> Thanks for your nice comments, please find the updated version at this link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019 
> <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019>
>
> Slide 2:
>
> 3-momenta p_a^* is the momentum in the pair rest frame. We have explicitly 
> mentioned it in the poster now.
>
>
> Slide 4:
>
> We reorganized this slide.
>
> The proton and Xi’s purity are from data, we also explicitly wrote it in the 
> poster.
>
>
> Thanks and Best regards,
>
> Zhi
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *发件人:* Mate Csanad <csanad AT bnl.gov>
> *发送时间:* 2022年4月2日 22:52
> *收件人:* Q Z <qinz18 AT outlook.com>; STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG 
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo.star AT hotmail.com>
> *主题:* Re: [Star-cf-l] 回复: STAR presentation by Zhi Qin for Quark Matter 2022 
> submitted for review
> Dear Zhi,
>
> Thanks for the nice poster. If I understand well, now it is my turn (as an
> assigned reviewer) to check and comment on it. Please find a few suggestions 
> (or
> questions) below:
>
> Slide 1
> - extends -> extents
> - from the -> from (although I am also not a native speaker)
> - for the pairs of p-Lambda and p-Xi- -> for p-Lambda and p-Xi- pairs
> - extend -> extent
>
> Slide 2
> - you could probably expand "YN" to "hyperon-nucleon (YN)"
> - Spatio-temporal -> spatio-temporal
> - 3GeV -> 3 GeV
> - what is the difference between 3-momenta p_a and p_a^*? or is the '*' a
> misprint there?
> - what frame is the absolute value in the definition of k^* taken? should be
> mentioned explicitely (probably pair comoving frame?)
> - the equation after "Given by" is a bit too compressed; I would separate it 
> into
>    C(k^*)=...(the integral)...
> and
>    C(k^*->0)=1
> as it is probably more clear this way
>
> Slide 3
> - of TPC -> of the TPC
> - 0.25mm ->0.25 mm
>
> Slide 4
> - I would have the text before the plots and the equations, as those are not
> understandable without it, and people tend to read from top to bottom
> - These purity plots are based on the mentioned simulation, right? If so, it
> would be good to write this on the plots, to avoid any misuderstanding.
> - On the contrary, the lambda plots are real measurements? If so, STAR
> preliminary (?) and all other details should  be given on them.
> - Would it be possible to define the side-band region on the slide, or at 
> least
> mention something about it?
> - What is the connection between the two C(k*) formulas? Does the sideband 
> part
> correspond to the i-j sum directly? Would be nice to clarify just a little 
> bit more.
>
> Slide 5
> - Probably \vec{k^*} is really just k^*, without the vector sign, right?
> - Can you add a bit more space before S_{4\pi}, just to separate the two
> equations better?
> - The "Makes it ..." line could be split (broken) at a better point, such as
> before "e.g.". Or it could be shortened to fit one line:
> "Possible to test model calculations: e.g. strong potential by HAL QCD 
> collab."
> - Linebreak in the "2B Au+Au ..." line could also be put at a more logical
> point, e.g., before "expected"
>
> Thanks, best regards,
> Mate
>
> 2022. 04. 02. 14:21 keltezéssel, Q Z via Star-cf-l írta:
> > Dear Xiaofeng,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the comments and signing off.
> > We update the slide on the same link
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019 
> <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019>
> > <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019 
> <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019>>
> > Best,
> > Zhi
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *发件人:* Star-cf-l <star-cf-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> 代表 Xiaofeng Luo via 
> > Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > *发送时间:* 2022年4月2日 10:59
> > *收件人:* STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > *主题:* Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Zhi Qin for Quark Matter 2022 
> > submitted for review
> > Hi Zhi and Yingjie,
> >
> >       Nice poster, please find my minor comments below :
> >       1. Slide 1, Please put ONLY ONE name there for the STAR collaboration.
> >       2. Slide 2, In the 3rd bullet of the motivation : "An attractive
> > p-Xi interaction is observed in p-Pb and pp collisions at ALICE "
> >          Please change to "An attractive p-Xi interaction has been
> > observed in Au+Au 200 GeV at STAR, p-Pb and pp collisions at ALICE "
> >          Since previously, STAR has reported p-Xi results at 200 GeV and
> > claim the observation of the attractive interaction in p and Xi.
> >
> >       With this implemented, I sign off.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Best Regards,
> > Xiaofeng
> >
> > On 2022/3/28 4:23 PM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Zhi Qin (qinz18 AT mails.tsinghua.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019 
> <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019>
> > <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019 
> <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59019>>
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l>
> > <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l>>
> > --
> > Xiaofeng Luo
> > Professor of Physics
> > College of Physical Science and Technology
> > Central China Normal University
> > Luoyu Road 152, Wuhan China
> > Office Phone #: +86-27-67867500
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l>
> > <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l>