Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for DAE HEP 2020 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
  • To: pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for DAE HEP 2020 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:44:32 +0900

Dear Prabhupada
I’ve been seeing a reasonable agreement between you and the one from Shaowei
in the E-mail discussions. If the previous preliminary shown in the last QM
is consistent
with your analysis within the statistical and systematic errors, we do not
have to
update/modify the previous results, what you are showing now in this slide is
then
the one from the previous preliminary? or new results? You mentioned in the
reply to
Jiangyong’s E-mail, you seem to exclude systematic errors in one of the
companion
plots, however the comparison to the models or other data should always
include the
both statistical and systematic errors. There are some exceptions where you
can
exclude one of them, when you are comparing the exact same data sets or in
case
some systematics would cancel etc...
Best regards, ShinIchi

> 2020/12/09 3:07、pdixit via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:
>
> On 2020-12-08 21:41, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>> HI, Prabhupada
>> Just a few comments on your nice talk.
>> 1 Please add slide number
>> 2 slide 9 show the results from EPD and TPC are consistent within 10%.
>> Are you quoting that as the systematic uncertainties?
>> 3 You do not indicate which method you use for v2 measurement.
>> 4 slide 10 and 12 should include systetematic uncertatinties for v2
>> measurements and for the EP resolution (even if they are small they
>> should be included)
>> Jiangyong
>> On 12/8/20 12:06 AM, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-03 23:13, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>>>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>> Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a
>>>> material for a
>>>> review, please have a look:
>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52968
>>>> ---
>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>>> Hi all,
>>> This is a gentle reminder to review my presentation. The conference is
>>> on 14th December so I would like to request all to give your comments
>>> and suggestion early.
>>> Thanks and regards
>>> Prabhupada Dixit
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> Hi Jiangyong,
> Thank you so much for your comments and suggestions.
> 1. I have added the slide number.
>
> 2.slide 9 show the results from EPD and TPC are consistent within 10%. Are
> you quoting that as the systematic uncertainties?
> - No, we are not quoting that as systematic uncertainty. Those two results
> are from different run and the event plane used there are also from
> different detectors. We have just compared both the results in this slide.
>
> 3.You do not indicate which method you use for v2 measurement.
> - We have used invariant mass method here. I have updated the slide with
> this information.
>
> 4. slide 10 and 12 should include systematic uncertainties for v2
> measurements and for the EP resolution (even if they are small they should
> be included)
> - The v2 for 54GeV is already STAR Preliminary in QM-19 (by Shaowei Lan)
> which does not have systematic uncertainty. As suggested by Prithwish and
> ShinIchi in FCV-PWG group meeting we are showing that result.
> In slide-12 we have also removed systematic error bar from 27GeV since we
> are showing v2 for both the energies side by side this will look odd if one
> has extra systematic error bar and one has not.
>
> link to updated slide:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DAE_HEP_Talk_version_1.pdf
> Please suggest if any other changes required.
>
> Thanks and regards
> Prabhupada Dixit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page