STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

On 2020-12-09 16:43, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> On 2020-12-09 06:21, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Prabhupada
> > Do you have a better plot of v2(Minv), where you do see a visible 
> > difference
> > in v2 between signal and combinatorial? A peak or dip in some other pT 
> > or
> > centrality selections? I do not mean this method is bad, but it’s just 
> > more
> > convincing, if one sees a dip or a peak around the phi mass region...
> > Best regards, ShinIchi
> >
> > > 2020/12/09 9:44、ShinIchi Esumi 
> > > <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>のメール:
> > >
> > > Dear Prabhupada
> > > I’ve been seeing a reasonable agreement between you and the one from 
> > > Shaowei
> > > in the E-mail discussions. If the previous preliminary shown in the 
> > > last QM is consistent
> > > with your analysis within the statistical and systematic errors, we 
> > > do not have to
> > > update/modify the previous results, what you are showing now in this 
> > > slide is then
> > > the one from the previous preliminary? or new results? You mentioned 
> > > in the reply to
> > > Jiangyong’s E-mail, you seem to exclude systematic errors in one of 
> > > the companion
> > > plots, however the comparison to the models or other data should 
> > > always include the
> > > both statistical and systematic errors. There are some exceptions 
> > > where you can
> > > exclude one of them, when you are comparing the exact same data sets 
> > > or in case
> > > some systematics would cancel etc...
> > > Best regards, ShinIchi
> > >
> > > > 2020/12/09 3:07、pdixit via Star-fcv-l 
> > > > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020-12-08 21:41, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > HI, Prabhupada
> > > > > Just a few comments on your nice talk.
> > > > > 1 Please add slide number
> > > > > 2 slide 9 show the results from EPD and TPC are consistent within 
> > > > > 10%.
> > > > > Are you quoting that as the systematic uncertainties?
> > > > > 3 You do not indicate which method you use for v2 measurement.
> > > > > 4 slide 10 and 12 should include systetematic uncertatinties for v2
> > > > > measurements and for the EP resolution (even if they are small they
> > > > > should be included)
> > > > > Jiangyong
> > > > > On 12/8/20 12:06 AM, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > > On 2020-12-03 23:13, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > > > > Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a
> > > > > > > material for a
> > > > > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52968
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > This is a gentle reminder to review my presentation. The 
> > > > > > conference is
> > > > > > on 14th December so I would like to request all to give your 
> > > > > > comments
> > > > > > and suggestion early.
> > > > > > Thanks and regards
> > > > > > Prabhupada Dixit
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > Hi Jiangyong,
> > > > Thank you so much for your comments and suggestions.
> > > > 1. I have added the slide number.
> > > >
> > > > 2.slide 9 show the results from EPD and TPC are consistent within 
> > > > 10%. Are you quoting that as the systematic uncertainties?
> > > > - No, we are not quoting that as systematic uncertainty. Those two 
> > > > results are from different run and the event plane used there are 
> > > > also from different detectors. We have just compared both the 
> > > > results in this slide.
> > > >
> > > > 3.You do not indicate which method you use for v2 measurement.
> > > > - We have used invariant mass method here. I have updated the slide 
> > > > with this information.
> > > >
> > > > 4. slide 10 and 12 should include systematic uncertainties for v2 
> > > > measurements and for the EP resolution (even if they are small they 
> > > > should be included)
> > > > - The v2 for 54GeV is already STAR Preliminary in QM-19 (by Shaowei 
> > > > Lan) which does not have systematic uncertainty. As suggested by 
> > > > Prithwish and ShinIchi in FCV-PWG group meeting we are showing that 
> > > > result.
> > > > In slide-12 we have also removed systematic error bar from 27GeV 
> > > > since we are showing v2 for both the energies side by side this will 
> > > > look odd if one has extra systematic error bar and one has not.
> > > >
> > > > link to updated slide: 
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DAE_HEP_Talk_version_1.pdf
> > > > Please suggest if any other changes required.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and regards
> > > > Prabhupada Dixit.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> Hi ShinIchi,
> Thanks for your comments.
> 1. I have updated the v2(Minv) plot with a better one.
> 2. You have asked whether we are showing the previous preliminary
> result or new. The answer is YES, we are showing the previous
> preliminary result for v2 at 54GeV. The only new one is v2 at 27GeV
> using EPD event plane.
> 3. As you suggested we have put the systematic error bar in the model
> comparison plot.
>
> the link the modified slide is
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DAE_HEP_Talk_version_2.pdf
>
> Thanks and regards
> Prabhupada Dixit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Hi all,
I found that link to my updated presentation is showing some error so 
here I am posting the new link
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DAE_HEP_Talk_version_2_0.pdf

Thank You
Prabhupada Dixit