STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Gaoguo and Niseem
We did not hear you back on the merging of your two abstracts. If you agree, 
please discuss between you and go ahead to make a merged/combined abstract 
for a combined “strong” talk as mentioned earlier. Or please propose separate 
abstracts for two posters. 
Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi

> Dear Zhenyu and Niseem
> Our intention was to make it more attractive to get accepted as a talk, 
> rather 
> than two single abstracts, which do have some relations in terms of the 
> longitudinal 
> dynamics, so we hoped you two could think more about in that direction. 
> However 
> if both of you do not intend to do this, we also need to discuss with other 
> submissions, 
> and/or we might need to drop one or both of them to be submitted as 
> poster... 
> Best regards, ShinIchi

> On Nov 11, 2021, at 23:46, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l 
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> 
> One possibility could be emphasize we use flow/hydro to probe the 
> longitudinal structure of initial state and transport properties of the 
> final state and their energy dependences. This would be able to bring the 
> two together.
> 
> Jiangyong
> 
> On 11/10/21 9:56 PM, zhchen via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I am not strongly against the merging of Gaoguo and Niseeem's abstracts, 
>> but I do have the concern the talk will be too dense.
>> After considering the man-power, data readiness and time left until QM, we 
>> propose to extend Gaoguo's abstract to cover 19.6 and 14.5 GeV Au+Au 
>> decorrelation. So it will be stronger to stand itself.
>> The new abstract is at 
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM22_DeCorr_Energy_Size.pdf
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Zhenyu
>> 
>> 在 2021-11-11 03:13，Niseem Magdy via Star-fcv-l 写道：
>>> Dear Jiangyong and All,
>>> 
>>> I think the two abstracts (talk-9) are totally different. Merging them
>>> not be effective and will not send a clear message.
>>> I think that my abstract can stand by itself since it contains
>>> 2-projects across different energies.
>>> 
>>> Therefore, I do not agree with the merging.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Niseem 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l