STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Niseem Magdy <niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com>]

Dear Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi,

I didn't hear a reasonable argument from you as to why my abstract can 
not be a talk abstract.

You have moved my abstract to a poster abstract because I disagree with 
the convener's point of view; this issue was never discussed with us; 
This is not a scientific reasoning to me. I never faced this in STAR before.

I fully disagree with the convener's moving my abstract to be a poster 
abstract without any discussion.

Thanks,
Niseem

On 11/17/21 11:38 AM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Gaoguo and Niseem
> We did not hear you back on the merging of your two abstracts. If you agree,
> please discuss between you and go ahead to make a merged/combined abstract
> for a combined “strong” talk as mentioned earlier. Or please propose separate
> abstracts for two posters.
> Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi
>
> > Dear Zhenyu and Niseem
> > Our intention was to make it more attractive to get accepted as a talk, rather
> > than two single abstracts, which do have some relations in terms of the 
> > longitudinal
> > dynamics, so we hoped you two could think more about in that direction. 
> > However
> > if both of you do not intend to do this, we also need to discuss with other 
> > submissions,
> > and/or we might need to drop one or both of them to be submitted as poster...
> > Best regards, ShinIchi
> > On Nov 11, 2021, at 23:46, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l 
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> > One possibility could be emphasize we use flow/hydro to probe the 
> > longitudinal structure of initial state and transport properties of the final 
> > state and their energy dependences. This would be able to bring the two 
> > together.
> >
> > Jiangyong
> >
> > On 11/10/21 9:56 PM, zhchen via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I am not strongly against the merging of Gaoguo and Niseeem's abstracts, but 
> > > I do have the concern the talk will be too dense.
> > > After considering the man-power, data readiness and time left until QM, we 
> > > propose to extend Gaoguo's abstract to cover 19.6 and 14.5 GeV Au+Au 
> > > decorrelation. So it will be stronger to stand itself.
> > > The new abstract is at 
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM22_DeCorr_Energy_Size.pdf
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Zhenyu
> > >
> > > 在 2021-11-11 03:13，Niseem Magdy via Star-fcv-l 写道：
> > > > Dear Jiangyong and All,
> > > >
> > > > I think the two abstracts (talk-9) are totally different. Merging them
> > > > not be effective and will not send a clear message.
> > > > I think that my abstract can stand by itself since it contains
> > > > 2-projects across different energies.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, I do not agree with the merging.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Niseem
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l