STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Robertson, Charles William" <rober558 AT purdue.edu>]

Hello Sooraj,

As Fuqiang mentioned, we presented a consistency check using the conventional method that agreed with our poster results.  Without the requested raw distributions from the other group, we could not perform any additional checks. So, it's unclear how this discrepancy could have been resolved before QM. 

In order to move things forward, I have removed our raw rho00 vs. energy plot at the FCV convenor's recommendation. This plot has been replaced by our raw <cos^2> vs mass plots for the four energies.

The updated poster can be found in the same place. Here's the link: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/CWR-QM2023_poster_6c_0.pdf

Thanks,

-CW

---

From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Sooraj Radhakrishnan via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, September 4, 2023 12:44 PM
To: Wang, Fuqiang <fqwang AT purdue.edu>
Cc: Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov>; webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Charles Robertson for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review

 

---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----

Hi Fuqiang,

    We had discussions at the pre QM specifically on CWs poster where conveners have pointed out (and the PAs agree) that the raw rho00 from CWRs analysis differs from the raw rho00 from the publication. The reason of this discrepancy is not understood and conveners, PAC and spokespersons have expressed their unwillingness to show the raw rho00 from CWRs analysis publicly before we understand the differences. This was made very clear in the discussion. The discrepancy is still an internal matter for STAR to understand and resolve

Best

Sooraj

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 11:34 AM Wang, Fuqiang <fqwang AT purdue.edu> wrote:

Sooraj,

You stated discussions “with the PAs conveners and spokespersons”. I checked with CW; we were not involved in those discussions. Please clarify what were discussed, and the concrete reason(s) why our raw data plot needs to be removed. 

I will respond further after seeing Rosi’s STAR overview talk. 

Best regards,

Fuqiang

On Sep 4, 2023, at 11:18 AM, Sooraj Radhakrishnan via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:



---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----

Hi CWR,

   Following the many discussions we have had over the past week and during the pre QM meeting with the PAs conveners and spokespersons, please revise your poster with the plot comparing raw data from your analysis with the published results removed and instead with the steps of your correction procedure  (you can move some of the text on the lower box to the box now saying 'Raw Results'). Please upload your updated poster with this change so that we can sign off on it

Best,

Sooraj

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:30 PM webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Charles Robertson (rober558 AT purdue.edu) has submitted a material for a 
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64865

Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

--

Sooraj Radhakrishnan

Research Scientist,

Department of Physics

Kent State University

Kent, OH 44243

Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate

Nuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road

Berkeley, CA 94720

Ph: 510-495-2473

Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l