star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
[Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production
- From: "Ye, Zhenyu" <yezhenyu AT uic.edu>
- To: Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
- Cc: "star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 02:56:13 +0000
Dear all,
As the production starts ramping up, I think we should try to conduct a
safety review asap to get pre-approval of components/materials that will be
used in the detector module production soon. These would include all the
materials to make the detector modules, especially Chroming used to coat the
cooling tubes, glue/thermal grease used for hybrid/MS assembly at NCKU in the
next few weeks. We can also include the materials used for APV/Silicon sensor
assembly as well.
Shall we also include the other things, such as the T-board, cable, cooling
tubes?
Zhenyu
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 8:20 AM, Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu> wrote:
>
> hi Zhenyu,
> I believe someone from BNL from the project (Rahul? Flemming?) needs
> to consult with the appropriate safety officers to get advanced clearance
> of anything doubtful in the design, before production. This is how it went
> for instance with the custom cables used in IST and SSD - the cables were
> not official rated cables, rather only "by design similar" to such, and we
> submitted the documentation and samples _before_ detector production (but
> of course, after cable production, which was an investment that had to come
> first) for approval. The documents were examined, I believe at least one of
> the cables was given a burn test at BNL, and we got approval to use. Then
> in the safety review before installation we just referenced that approval
> and no problems. There was a similar pre=approval process for the Wiener
> MPOD power supplies, taken care of in the time of FGT detector construction.
> Flemming could correct this, but I don't believe such actual safety
> approval is within the scope of this review or committee. But a plan to get
> approval where needed, must be.
> Sincerely,
>
> Gerard
>
>
> On 7/31/2020 9:10 AM, Ye, Zhenyu wrote:
>> I don’t know when the safety review will take place, but we certainly need
>> the ES&H clearance before the actual production starts, because we can’t
>> have all the modules produced and then learn some of them do not meet the
>> requirement.
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fst-l mailing list
> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
-
[Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Ye, Zhenyu, 08/19/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Aschenauer Elke-Caroline, 08/19/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Ye, Zhenyu, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Gerard Visser, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Zhenyu Ye, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Gerard Visser, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Zhenyu Ye, 08/26/2020
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production, Capotosto, Michael, 08/26/2020
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production, Zhenyu Ye, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Zhenyu Ye, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Gerard Visser, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Zhenyu Ye, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Gerard Visser, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Ye, Zhenyu, 08/26/2020
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Safety review before module production,
Aschenauer Elke-Caroline, 08/19/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.