star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
- From: Monika Robotková <robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
- To: "webmaster AT star.bnl.gov" <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>, Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:45:14 +0000
Hello Nihar,
Thank you very much for your comments, I've implemented them and uploaded v4 on Drupal page.
Best regards,
Monika
Od: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> za uživatele Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Odesláno: 22. července 2022 7:46:49
Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
Odesláno: 22. července 2022 7:46:49
Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
Hello Monika,
Please find my comments on your nice proceedings.
L15, radius or split -> radius, or split …
L16, (R_g) and the QCD - > R_g), and the QCD
L17, the first split for jets of varying -> the first split of jets at
varying
L25: ChromoDynamics -> Chromodynamics
L28: "in our analysis." -> "in this measurement."
L47: "finite resolution of the detector" Not only fine resolution but
also tracking efficiency. So I would suggest to use "by the detector
effects such as detector efficiency and pT-resolution,…" or something
similar.
L48: " true particle-level spectra " -> "the true particle-level
spectra "
L57: Please mention what are dominating systematic uncertainties?
L62 "3. Evolution of the splitting kinematics as we travel along the jet
shower " -> How about this "Evolution of the splitting kinematics along
the jet shower"
L83:" In this proceedings we " -> "In this proceedings, we…"
L86: " that selecting on Rg at the first split " -> " that the
selection of R_g at the first split…"
Change "template " and "TEMPLETE" at the top.
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-07-20 03:27, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60343
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Please find my comments on your nice proceedings.
L15, radius or split -> radius, or split …
L16, (R_g) and the QCD - > R_g), and the QCD
L17, the first split for jets of varying -> the first split of jets at
varying
L25: ChromoDynamics -> Chromodynamics
L28: "in our analysis." -> "in this measurement."
L47: "finite resolution of the detector" Not only fine resolution but
also tracking efficiency. So I would suggest to use "by the detector
effects such as detector efficiency and pT-resolution,…" or something
similar.
L48: " true particle-level spectra " -> "the true particle-level
spectra "
L57: Please mention what are dominating systematic uncertainties?
L62 "3. Evolution of the splitting kinematics as we travel along the jet
shower " -> How about this "Evolution of the splitting kinematics along
the jet shower"
L83:" In this proceedings we " -> "In this proceedings, we…"
L86: " that selecting on Rg at the first split " -> " that the
selection of R_g at the first split…"
Change "template " and "TEMPLETE" at the top.
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-07-20 03:27, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60343
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review,
webmaster, 07/19/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 07/19/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Monika Robotková, 07/20/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/22/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review,
Monika Robotková, 07/22/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Nihar Sahoo, 07/22/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review,
Monika Robotková, 07/22/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 07/19/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.