Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Monika Robotková <robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
  • To: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:02:27 +0000

Hi Barbara,

Thank you very much for your useful comments, I've implemented them and uploaded v2 on Drupal page.


Best regards,

Monika


Od: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> za uľivatele Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Odesláno: 1. října 2022 15:54:56
Komu: STAR HardProbes PWG
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review
 
Hi Monika,

very nice slides. Please find below my comments/suggestions for your consideration.

Cheers,
Barbara

- s4: for completeness, add what is d_ij below the picture
- s4: ideal to be used to resolve -> ideal for resolving
- s7,8: I would make one slide (e.g. you can remove s8). I guess you want to show examples of pp and AA cases for jet substructure studies, but I would suggest being brief on this. You have nice results to show, I think it's better to spend more time on them. I would even show more of the results in this presentation.
- s12: reduce font of the reference
- s12: do you need a bullet with STAR references ? If it's important for your story, it's fine. Otherwise, I would spend more time on explaining the groomed observables.
- s13: Measurements affected -> Measurements are affected (to match style of the rest of the text)
- s13: It's hard here to quickly understand the procedure. The thirst and fourth bullets repeat some information. I would try to make them simpler, something like: 
   - Results are in 3D: z_g vs. R_g vs. p_T,jet
   - We unfold z_g vs R_g in 2D  via interactive Bayesian unfolding using RooUnfold in particle-level pT,jet bins 
   - Correction for p_T,jets is applied: For each particle-level pT,jet bin, we do projection ... 
- s14: here some conclusion is missing. You say about smearing and hierarchy modification, but don't say if and how you correct for this.
- s17: conclusions about z_g dependence on R_g is missing (e.g.  R g have steeper z g)
- s18: can we make a conclusion that collinear emissions are enhanced when going from 1st to 3rd split ?
- s18: The plots are separate, and so both need the "STAR Preliminary" label and legends. Unless you can make them side-by-side in a clever way.
- It would be nice to add comparison with MC



On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:55 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a 
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61206

Deadline: 2022-10-11
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page