STAR HardProbes PWG

[Monika Robotková <robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz>]

Hello Nihar,

Thank you very much for your useful comments, I've implemented them and uploaded v2 on Drupal page. Below are responses to your questions:

Slide#7
_Right side ATLAS plot: Not sure if there is any relevance to show
ATLAS's this plots.
If you want to emphasis on Jet substructure pQCD and non-pQCD
discussion, you could include STAR's jet M, Rg, Zg, etc., results.
Is there anything you want to point out here that I missed?

I just wanted to point out that there are substructure measurements also in other experiments and say why our measurement is new, but I switched the plots and included STAR results.

Slide#8:
_On right plot, what do you want to say here? What is the relevance to
your presentation and results? Do you have plan to do similar
measurement in Au+Au in STAR?

See response above. On the last slide, I would like to say that we plan to do differential measurements in Au+Au but using EEC.

Slide#17-18:
Do you have plan to include any of PYTHIA MC results for these data?

I added one slide with MC comparisons.

Best regards,

Monika

---

Od: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> za uživatele Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Odesláno: 1. října 2022 8:19:42
Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review

 

Hello Monika,

Please find my comments below  on your nice presentation slides.

Slide#4
Anti-Kt, Cambridge/Aachen -> please give references (although it is know
to all)

Slide#7
_Right side ATLAS plot: Not sure if there is any relevance to show
ATLAS's this plots.
If you want to emphasis on Jet substructure pQCD and non-pQCD
discussion, you could include STAR's jet M, Rg, Zg, etc., results.
Is there anything you want to point out here that I missed?

_On Bullet p+p Collisions, I think it is important to mention the
physics why in p+p collision it is important to study jet substructure
observable?  That is "to study vacuum QCD shower at RHIC energy"  along
with "comparison with QCD predictions and tuning of MC generator" are
other motivations.

_Fourth bullet is redundant, you can remove it. As in p+p collisions you
already mention this (see above comment)

Slide#8:
_On right plot, what do you want to say here? What is the relevance to
your presentation and results? Do you have plan to do similar
measurement in Au+Au in STAR?

Slide#9:
_A bit confuse with the text.
"To ways how to…" -> do you want to say "Two ways to study…" or "Ways to
study parton shower…"

Slide#11
_Reconstruction of charged particle tracks -> "Charged particle
identification for jet reconstruction"
_Reconstruction of neutral component… -> "Detection of neutral particles
for jet reconstruction"
_"Segmentation" -> Granularity
_ "Resolution parameters" -> "Jet resolution parameters:"
_"Located at the RHIC…" ->"Located at RHIC…"

Slide#13:
_"… and obtain particle-level distribution" -> "and obtain true
(particle-level) distribution"
_"… pT,jet bit…" -> pT,jet bin,

Slide#17-18:
Do you have plan to include any of PYTHIA MC results for these data?


Cheers
Nihar






On 2022-09-29 02:23, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61206
>
> Deadline: 2022-10-11
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l