STAR HardProbes PWG

[Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>]

Hi Monika,

Thanks a lot for the nice slides. I have some very minor suggestions/comments on v3 for your consideration. 

 p4: hadronize --> hadronization 

 p7: RHIC energy --> energies (?)

 p7: Title: Two ways how to study .. --> Two ways to study 

 p16: could you please remind me if the color bands are the total or systematic uncertainty? 

 p16, p17, p18: the styles of "STAR Preliminary" are different in these plots. Is it possible to make them consistent? (very minor suggestions, please feel free to ignore it.) 

 

Cheers,

Yi

 

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 7:06 AM Monika Robotková via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Barbara and Nihar,

Thank you for signing off, I uploaded new version on Drupal with very small changes based on comments from rehearsal at our institute.

Best regards,

Monika

---

Od: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Odesláno: 4. října 2022 15:09:48
Komu: Nihar Sahoo; STAR HardProbes PWG
Kopie: Monika Robotková
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review

 

Hi Monika,

I sign off as well.

Cheers,

Barbara

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:00 PM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Monika,

Thank you for implementing my suggestions and replying to my questions.
I don't have any further comments. I sign off.

Enjoy HQ2022. It is a good format conference.

Cheers
Nihar



On 2022-10-03 19:29, Monika Robotková wrote:
> Hello Nihar,
>
> Thank you very much for your useful comments, I've implemented them
> and uploaded v2 on Drupal page. Below are responses to your questions:
>
>
> Slide#7
> _Right side ATLAS plot: Not sure if there is any relevance to show
> ATLAS's this plots.
> If you want to emphasis on Jet substructure pQCD and non-pQCD
> discussion, you could include STAR's jet M, Rg, Zg, etc., results.
> Is there anything you want to point out here that I missed?
>
> I just wanted to point out that there are substructure measurements
> also in other experiments and say why our measurement is new, but I
> switched the plots and included STAR results.
>
> Slide#8:
> _On right plot, what do you want to say here? What is the relevance to
> your presentation and results? Do you have plan to do similar
> measurement in Au+Au in STAR?
>
> See response above. On the last slide, I would like to say that we
> plan to do differential measurements in Au+Au but using EEC.
>
> Slide#17-18:
> Do you have plan to include any of PYTHIA MC results for these data?
>
> I added one slide with MC comparisons.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Monika
> -------------------------
>
> Od: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> za uživatele Nihar
> Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Odesláno: 1. října 2022 8:19:42
> Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
> Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for
> Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review
>
> Hello Monika,
>
> Please find my comments below  on your nice presentation slides.
>
> Slide#4
> Anti-Kt, Cambridge/Aachen -> please give references (although it is
> know
> to all)
>
> Slide#7
> _Right side ATLAS plot: Not sure if there is any relevance to show
> ATLAS's this plots.
> If you want to emphasis on Jet substructure pQCD and non-pQCD
> discussion, you could include STAR's jet M, Rg, Zg, etc., results.
> Is there anything you want to point out here that I missed?
>
> _On Bullet p+p Collisions, I think it is important to mention the
> physics why in p+p collision it is important to study jet substructure
>
> observable?  That is "to study vacuum QCD shower at RHIC energy"
> along
> with "comparison with QCD predictions and tuning of MC generator" are
> other motivations.
>
> _Fourth bullet is redundant, you can remove it. As in p+p collisions
> you
> already mention this (see above comment)
>
> Slide#8:
> _On right plot, what do you want to say here? What is the relevance to
>
> your presentation and results? Do you have plan to do similar
> measurement in Au+Au in STAR?
>
> Slide#9:
> _A bit confuse with the text.
> "To ways how to…" -> do you want to say "Two ways to study…" or
> "Ways to
> study parton shower…"
>
> Slide#11
> _Reconstruction of charged particle tracks -> "Charged particle
> identification for jet reconstruction"
> _Reconstruction of neutral component… -> "Detection of neutral
> particles
> for jet reconstruction"
> _"Segmentation" -> Granularity
> _ "Resolution parameters" -> "Jet resolution parameters:"
> _"Located at the RHIC…" ->"Located at RHIC…"
>
> Slide#13:
> _"… and obtain particle-level distribution" -> "and obtain true
> (particle-level) distribution"
> _"… pT,jet bit…" -> pT,jet bin,
>
> Slide#17-18:
> Do you have plan to include any of PYTHIA MC results for these data?
>
> Cheers
> Nihar
>
> On 2022-09-29 02:23, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material
> for a
>> review, please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61206
>>
>> Deadline: 2022-10-11
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l