STAR HardProbes PWG

[Robert Líčeník <licenik AT ujf.cas.cz>]

Hi Barbara and Nihar,

thank you very much for your useful comments and suggestions. 

I have adopted most of them along with some additional suggestions received internally and you can find the new version at the link below:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Measurement-inclusive-and-semi-inclusive-jet-production-heavy-ion-co

Please see some comments below

 

Line13: "to remove uncorrelated combinatorial background." -> "to
mitigate uncorrelated background in present heavy-ion collisions."
Line13-14: "The reported distributions are fully corrected for any
remaining background fluctuations and detector effects using unfolding
techniques." -> "The reported jet distributions are fully corrected for
the heavy-ion background fluctuations and the detector effects using the
unfolding techniques.

We would prefer to keep this as is, since we want to distinguish between the two different approaches of the two analyses regarding background suppression.

 

Line16-20:" The high…with the charged particle jets." -> "The inclusive
full jet reconstruction is carried out up to jet $p_{T,jet}$ ~ 50 GeV/c
with resolution parameter R=0.2-0.4 using Au+Au collisions data taken in
2014. This extends the kinematic range significantly compared with the
previous charged particle jet measurement."
[high-statiscs no needed to mention here; BEMC trigger selection not
needed in this abstract, already  a lot of info]

We would prefer to keep the BEMC trigger information there as it is the key reason for why we can achieve such kinematic reach.

 

L24-26: As per Yang's last QM status discussion, there was no mention of
jet acoplanarity measurement. If that is the case, please drop this
sentence.

I asked Yang to clarify this statement.

Please have a look at the new version and let me know how it reads and whether you have any additional comments/suggestions.

Thanks,
Robert