STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Robert and Yang,

Thank you for addressing my comments.
I sign off.

Cheers
Nihar

On 2023-04-21 18:56, Robert Líčeník wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> thank you for these additional comments and for signing off the
> abstract. I have implemented all of them and the newest version is
> available at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Measurement-inclusive-and-semi-inclusive-jet-production-heavy-ion-co
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 1:23 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Robert,
> >
> > Please find my additional comments on this merged abstract.
> > With these implemented, I sign off.
> >
> > L13: pT-threshold  -> $p_{\rm T}$ threshold.
> > L19: pT,jet -> jet transverse momentum
> > L26-28: "The exploration of the medium-induced acoplanarity over a
> > wide
> > phase space, including the low-pT region for large jet radius, is
> > presented as well. " Drop this sentence as we have not seen any
> > result
> > so far and no proposal was discussed in QM status presentation by
> > PAs.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2023-04-20 21:30, Robert Líčeník wrote:
> > > Hi Barbara and Nihar,
> > >
> > > thank you very much for your useful comments and suggestions.
> > > I have adopted most of them along with some additional suggestions
> > > received internally and you can find the new version at the link
> > > below:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Measurement-inclusive-and-semi-inclusive-jet-production-heavy-ion-co
> > > Please see some comments below
> > >
> > > > Line13: "to remove uncorrelated combinatorial background." -> "to
> > > > mitigate uncorrelated background in present heavy-ion
> > collisions."
> > > > Line13-14: "The reported distributions are fully corrected for
> > any
> > > > remaining background fluctuations and detector effects using
> > > > unfolding
> > > > techniques." -> "The reported jet distributions are fully
> > corrected
> > > > for
> > > > the heavy-ion background fluctuations and the detector effects
> > using
> > > > the
> > > > unfolding techniques.
> > >
> > > We would prefer to keep this as is, since we want to distinguish
> > > between the two different approaches of the two analyses regarding
> > > background suppression.
> > >
> > > > Line16-20:" The high…with the charged particle jets." -> "The
> > > > inclusive
> > > > full jet reconstruction is carried out up to jet $p_{T,jet}$ ~ 50
> > > > GeV/c
> > > > with resolution parameter R=0.2-0.4 using Au+Au collisions data
> > > > taken in
> > > > 2014. This extends the kinematic range significantly compared
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > previous charged particle jet measurement."
> > > > [high-statiscs no needed to mention here; BEMC trigger selection
> > not
> > > > needed in this abstract, already  a lot of info]
> > >
> > > We would prefer to keep the BEMC trigger information there as it
> > is
> > > the key reason for why we can achieve such kinematic reach.
> > >
> > > > L24-26: As per Yang's last QM status discussion, there was no
> > > > mention of
> > > > jet acoplanarity measurement. If that is the case, please drop
> > this
> > > > sentence.
> > >
> > > I asked Yang to clarify this statement.
> > >
> > > Please have a look at the new version and let me know how it reads
> > and
> > > whether you have any additional comments/suggestions.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Robert