STAR HardProbes PWG

[tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Nihar，

 I do not have strong reason for that. And I corrected it in the same 
link.
Please look at it .

Thanks,
Qian Yang

On 2023-09-28 14:19, Nihar Sahoo wrote:
> Hello Qian,
>
> Thank you for implementing some of my comments.
>
> I have a follow up comment that I find you have not addressed.
>
> > > _ J/ψ can be polarized by… -> in the spin alignment context better to
> > > say "J/ψ spin aligns in the direction of global angular momentum due
> > > to spin-orbital coupling"
> > > Better avoid mixing "J/psi polarization" and "J/psi spin alignment" 
> > > in the text.
>
> I find you keep the same "J/ψ can be polarized by the spin-orbit
> coupling " (L14).
> My suggestion was not to mix "polarized" in the context of "the
> spin-orbit coupling"; they are two physics topics and we need to make
> sure they should not be mixed in the text.
> Better to use "aligned" like spin is aligned.
>
> Let me know if you have a strong reason for it.
>
> Best
> Nihar
>
>
>
>
> On 2023-09-28 10:57, tc88qy wrote:
> > Hello Nihar,
> >   Thanks for your carefully reading and suggestions.
> >  I keep "Ru +Ru and Zr+Zr" in the title. It would be more friendly to
> > those people not from STAR experiment to know the collision system
> > directly.
> >  Other than that I have implemented all your suggestions in the new
> > version (v2).
> >
> > Thanks
> > Qian Yang
> >
> > On 2023-09-27 14:42, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Hello Qian,
> > >
> > > Please find my comments on your abstract.
> > >
> > >
> > > Title: You can shorten a bit.
> > > "Measurements of J/ψ polarization and global spin alignment in Ru+Ru
> > > and Zr+Zr collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV from STAR experiment" ->
> > > "Measurements of J/ψ polarization and global spin alignment in isobar
> > > collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV by STAR"
> > >
> > > "J/psi" has been used many instances in this abstract. Please avoid.
> > >
> > > L9: "…suppression of J/ψ and zero J/ψ v2 …" -> suppression of J/ψ and
> > > its zero second order flow coefficient ...
> > >
> > > L12: "Beside J/ψ nulcear modification factor and J/ψ azimuthal
> > > anisotropy observable, the J/ψ polarization…" -> "Besides, the J/ψ
> > > polarization could provide additional information about the QGP
> > > properties and its production mechanism in heavy-ion collisions.
> > >  [No need to repeat again, already mentioned in previous sentence; 
> > > and
> > > "a new degree of study" doesn't sound good]
> > >
> > > L14-18: "it has been hypothesized…in early stage. -> This entire
> > > sentence sounds complicated. Can you please split it?
> > > Suggestion:
> > > _ hypothesized -> predicted
> > > _ J/ψ can be polarized by… -> in the spin alignment context better to
> > > say "J/ψ spin aligns in the direction of global angular momentum due
> > > to spin-orbital coupling"
> > > Better avoid mixing "J/psi polarization" and "J/psi spin alignment" 
> > > in the text.
> > >
> > > L22: will be present -> are reported
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Nihar
> > >
> > > On 2023-09-27 09:01, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Qian Yang (tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a 
> > > > review,
> > > > please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65290
> > > >
> > > > Deadline: 2023-10-10
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l