Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Diptanil Roy for HP2024 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
  • To: Diptanil Roy <roydiptanil AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Diptanil Roy for HP2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:58:22 +0000

Hi Neil,

I’m happy with this, and sign off. “help us put significant constraints” is grammatically correct (although maybe Nihar meant “help us in putting significant constraints” which would also work) so I will push it to STAR-talks.

Thanks,
Isaac

On May 14, 2024, at 15:09, Diptanil Roy <roydiptanil AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Nihar, if possible, I would like to keep the present version. Thank you.



On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 7:13 AM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Diptanil,

I have only a minor comment on your nice abstract. With this implemented 
I sign off.

L15: help us put significant constraints -> help us putting significant 
constraints

Best
Nihar

On 2024-05-14 03:31, Diptanil Roy via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi Isaac, thank you for your thorough comments on the abstract. An
> updated version is now available at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP_2024_v3_Diptanil_1.pdf.
> 
> Please find some inline comments below:
> 
>> 11. "of different resolution parameters"? But I recommend removing
>> "of different resolutions" anyway.
> 
> I want to keep this because the measurements at different jet cone
> sizes are new for Hard Probes.
> 
>> 13. You do introduce a lot of observables here without definition
>> (nuclear modification factors, fragmentation function, generalized
>> angularities, radial profile, ...). I understand that space is
>> limited, you're synthesizing a lot of work, and Hard Probes is a
>> niche/expert audience, but wanted to point it out in case you can
>> think of a compact way to address this point. You might be able to
>> save space by changing the comment about the HFT to a more generic
>> "along with subsystem improvements to the STAR experiment," or
>> something like that; also the end of that sentence is a bit
>> redundant with the last sentence of the abstract and could be
>> combined somehow.
> 
> I added formulae for the fragmentation function and angularities. I
> think that's the simplest way to add more information about the
> observables without going over the word limit. Let me know if you have
> any suggestions on if I can improve it.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 4:37 PM Mooney, Isaac
> <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Neil,
>> 
>> Good job combining different analyses to make a coherent abstract. I
>> have a few small comments below.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Isaac
>> 
>> 3. Remove "medium"
>> 
>> 4. This sentence is a bit of a run-on. Maybe: "...or through
>> medium-induced gluon bremsstrahlung, which is the dominant mode of
>> energy loss for gluons and light quarks. Theoretical calculations
>> predict that at low transverse momentum, this radiative energy loss
>> is suppressed for heavy quarks such as charm and bottom."
>> 
>> 8. "low-p_{T} charm-tagged"
>> 
>> 9. Remove "closer"
>> 
>> 11. "of different resolution parameters"? But I recommend removing
>> "of different resolutions" anyway.
>> 
>> 13. You do introduce a lot of observables here without definition
>> (nuclear modification factors, fragmentation function, generalized
>> angularities, radial profile, ...). I understand that space is
>> limited, you're synthesizing a lot of work, and Hard Probes is a
>> niche/expert audience, but wanted to point it out in case you can
>> think of a compact way to address this point. You might be able to
>> save space by changing the comment about the HFT to a more generic
>> "along with subsystem improvements to the STAR experiment," or
>> something like that; also the end of that sentence is a bit
>> redundant with the last sentence of the abstract and could be
>> combined somehow.
>> 
>> On May 13, 2024, at 03:28, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Neil,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for the updated version. It looks great to me. I don't
>> have any further comments on it.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Yi
>> 
>> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 5:05 AM Diptanil Roy
>> <roydiptanil AT gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Yi, thank you for your comments. I have now uploaded a v2 with
>> the suggested changes. Especially, the last paragraph has been
>> shortened a bit.
>> 
>> Here's the link to v2:
>> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP_2024_v2_Diptanil.pdf
>> [1]
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have any more comments.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:35 PM Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Neil,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for the nice abstract. I have some minor
>> comments/suggestions for your consideration.
>> - L1: heavy ion --> heavy-ion
>> - L11 - L15: it reads a bit long to me , I would merge them
>> together like: In this talk, we present several measurements of jet
>> related observables for D0(cu ̄) meson tagged jets in Au+Au
>> collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV collected by the STAR experiment,
>> including the yields and nuclear modification factors as functions
>> of pT,Jet, fragmentation function, and generalized angularities.
>> (probably not better than yours, so it is totally up to you.)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Yi
>> 
>> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 12:16 AM Diptanil Roy via Star-hp-l
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear conveners and HP-PWG,
>> 
>> Please find my contribution for HP 2024 below. I plan on presenting
>> a summary of all charm tagged jets measurement (spectra,
>> angularities, jet cone size dependence etc) at STAR.
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 12:11 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>> 
>> Diptanil Roy (roydiptanil AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67700
>> 
>> Deadline: 2024-05-25
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> ~ Neil _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> 
> --
> 
> ~ Neil _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> 
> --
> 
> ~ Neil
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP_2024_v2_Diptanil.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l


-- 
~ Neil




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page