Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Diptanil Roy for HP2024 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Diptanil Roy <roydiptanil AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
  • Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Diptanil Roy for HP2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 18:01:31 -0400

Hi Isaac, thank you for your thorough comments on the abstract. An updated version is now available at https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP_2024_v3_Diptanil_1.pdf.

Please find some inline comments below:

11. "of different resolution parameters"? But I recommend removing "of different resolutions" anyway.

I want to keep this because the measurements at different jet cone sizes are new for Hard Probes.

13. You do introduce a lot of observables here without definition (nuclear modification factors, fragmentation function, generalized angularities, radial profile, ...). I understand that space is limited, you're synthesizing a lot of work, and Hard Probes is a niche/expert audience, but wanted to point it out in case you can think of a compact way to address this point. You might be able to save space by changing the comment about the HFT to a more generic "along with subsystem improvements to the STAR experiment," or something like that; also the end of that sentence is a bit redundant with the last sentence of the abstract and could be combined somehow.

I added formulae for the fragmentation function and angularities. I think that's the simplest way to add more information about the observables without going over the word limit. Let me know if you have any suggestions on if I can improve it.

Cheers,

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 4:37 PM Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:
Hi Neil,

Good job combining different analyses to make a coherent abstract. I have a few small comments below.

Thanks,
Isaac

3. Remove "medium"

4. This sentence is a bit of a run-on. Maybe: "...or through medium-induced gluon bremsstrahlung, which is the dominant mode of energy loss for gluons and light quarks. Theoretical calculations predict that at low transverse momentum, this radiative energy loss is suppressed for heavy quarks such as charm and bottom."

8. "low-p_{T} charm-tagged"

9. Remove "closer"

11. "of different resolution parameters"? But I recommend removing "of different resolutions" anyway.

13. You do introduce a lot of observables here without definition (nuclear modification factors, fragmentation function, generalized angularities, radial profile, ...). I understand that space is limited, you're synthesizing a lot of work, and Hard Probes is a niche/expert audience, but wanted to point it out in case you can think of a compact way to address this point. You might be able to save space by changing the comment about the HFT to a more generic "along with subsystem improvements to the STAR experiment," or something like that; also the end of that sentence is a bit redundant with the last sentence of the abstract and could be combined somehow.

On May 13, 2024, at 03:28, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Neil,

Thanks a lot for the updated version. It looks great to me. I don't have any further comments on it.

Cheers,
Yi


On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 5:05 AM Diptanil Roy <roydiptanil AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Yi, thank you for your comments. I have now uploaded a v2 with the suggested changes. Especially, the last paragraph has been shortened a bit.


Please let me know if you have any more comments.

Thank you.

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:35 PM Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Neil,

Thanks a lot for the nice abstract. I have some minor comments/suggestions for your consideration. 
 - L1: heavy ion --> heavy-ion
 - L11 - L15: it reads a bit long to me , I would merge them together like: In this talk, we present several measurements of jet related observables for D0(cu ̄) meson tagged jets in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV collected by the STAR experiment, including the yields and nuclear modification factors as functions of pT,Jet, fragmentation function, and generalized angularities.  (probably not better than yours, so it is totally up to you.) 

Cheers,
Yi



On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 12:16 AM Diptanil Roy via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear conveners and HP-PWG,

Please find my contribution for HP 2024 below. I plan on presenting a summary of all charm tagged jets measurement (spectra, angularities, jet cone size dependence etc) at STAR.

Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Thank you.

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 12:11 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Diptanil Roy (roydiptanil AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67700

Deadline: 2024-05-25
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l


--
~ Neil
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l


--
~ Neil
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



--
~ Neil



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page