STAR HardProbes PWG

[Andrew Tamis <andrew.tamis AT yale.edu>]

Will upload to drupal, but sending here for now as it seems to be facing some slow-down

Best,

Andrew

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:37 PM Andrew Tamis <andrew.tamis AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hi Isaac,

Thank you very much for the comments, I have implemented them, please let me know if the point of "close to the massive case" has been made clear.  I have split it into two sentences now beginning at the end of line 14, as I believe it is a truly important point about the unique capabilities of STAR for this measurement.  I have saved space by merging the two sentences of paragraph one into one, so let me know if this reads well as well.

Additionally, I have reworked the title, so feedback would be appreciated on that as well.

Best,

Andrew

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:56 PM Mooney, Isaac via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Here are a few more small comments along with a replication of the comments I just gave you offline in your office so there is a record.

Thanks,

Isaac

Sentence 1: You did a great job making the abstract general to the N-point correlator for any N, but we discussed here removing “projected” and moving it to the first sentence of paragraph 2 because this sentence is valid for projected or non-projected correlators whereas you measure specifically the projected one.

Sentence 2: “approximately separates”

Sentence 3: “at which hadron groups with different charge compositions” or similar

Paragraph 2, sentence 1: “We will present”

Sentence 3: “at RHIC energies compared to LHC energies”

: Please revise to make “close to the massive case” and “observation of the non-perturbative effects of …” more clear especially for a reader not familiar with EECs.

Last sentence: “are presented”.

On May 13, 2024, at 02:14, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Thanks a lot. I don't have any further comments.

Cheers,

Yi

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:32 PM Andrew Tamis via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Yi,

Thank you very much for the suggestion, i have implimented it.

Best,

Andrew

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:03 PM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Thanks a lot for the well-written abstract. 

I only have one minor suggestion for your consideration. 

  - at STAR sqrt(s) --> at STAR collision energies 

 

Cheers,

Yi

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:27 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67701

Deadline: 2024-05-25
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

Attachment: Tamis_Hard_Probes_Abstract-v3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document