STAR HardProbes PWG

[Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>]

Hi Priyanka and Katarzyna,

Sorry for one last minor suggestion: it would be better if you can put the legends of 2 fm and 5 fm in the same order (now they are in the same color, but not the same order). 

Cheers,

Yi

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:59 PM Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Hi Yi,

Thanks for your suggestion. We already implemented it in the new version as I mentioned in another email.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP2024_talk_Gwizdziel_v3.pdf

After discussion, we are keeping the conclusion same. Please let us know if you have any further comments.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 9:27 AM
To: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>; STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for ICHEP 2024 got commented by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury

 

Hi Priyankan, Katarzyna,

Thanks a lot for the updated slides. I have two minor comments: 

 - p12 and 13: I just noticed that the colors for predictions (2 fm and 5 fm) are not consistent. Can you change them to be the same? For example, 2 fm in green and 5 fm in pink for both plots. Also change the text. 

 Also, can you use the same style for these two plots, like the legends for D0/D0-pi and -K, also the font sizes for collision information are different. 

 - Regarding the conclusion, I am thinking if it will be better to state that the results disfavor the small radius < 2 fm prediction? It is up to you.

Cheers,

Yi

On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 7:10 AM Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Hi Isaac, Yi, Nihar and all,

Please find the updated version of here.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP2024_talk_Gwizdziel_v2.pdf

Katarzyna has implemented all comments and suggestions. Please let me know if you have any further comments and questions.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 9:13 PM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>; Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>; webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for ICHEP 2024 got commented by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury

 

Hi Priyanka,

I only have a few small comments on your talk (below), and sign off.

Thanks,

Isaac

9. 1.6 < D0 mass < 2.2 GeV/c^2

11. 

Slide title and second bullet: "correlation"

Is there a reason the k* doesn't get a vector symbol on the LHS of eqs. 5 and 6?

General: from slide 11 onward, the talk gets very text-heavy. One example of a place you can trim would be s. 11 where I don’t think the “D0-hadron pair-purity correction is…” bullet is necessary, and instead you can just have an arrow from “D0 purity” in green above to the value: “~37%…”, and similar with arrows from hadron purity to the values for K, pi, and p. Please go through and think about places you can trim/remove (e.g. you can use sentence fragments instead of full sentences; you don’t need the first bullet on s. 12 because all of that information is in the figure just above; etc., etc.)

On Jul 8, 2024, at 17:09, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Priyanka,

Thanks a lot for the prompt reply. 

Yes, I would suggest removing "Figure X" and keeping the caption if you want. 

Cheers,

Yi

On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:07 AM Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Hi Yi,

Thanks for your feedback. We will address your comments soon. I have a small question and comment.

1. Do you suggest writing the figure captions without mentioning the figure no.?
2. You are correct, we don't have any prediction for D0-p pair yet, so we will make it clear and will also add the purity plots in backup.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 10:44 PM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>; webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for ICHEP 2024 got commented by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury

 

Hi Priyanka,

Thanks a lot for the nice talk. Please find my comments below:

 - p5: Figure 4 --> Figure 5  and all numbers of Figure are wrong afterward (I actually would suggest to remove all "Figure X" in the slides )

 - p14: I would add "Theoretical predictions are needed."

 - p15: The second bullet is only valid for D-pi and D-k since you don't have any prediction for D-p for now, right? 

 - I would suggest that you add the purity plots in the backup.

Cheers,

Yi

On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 6:17 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Priyanka Roy Chowdhury ( priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl ) has 
commented on a material originally submitted by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury ( 
priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ICHEP-2024/Measurement-heavy-flavour-femtoscopy-using-D0-mesons-and-charged-hadrons-Au

Comment:
Hi all, this talk has been uploaded on behalf of Katarzyna (speaker on behalf 
of me). Apologize for the previous emails with non-accessible links.

Regards,
Priyanka

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l