STAR HardProbes PWG

["Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>]

Hi Gabe,

See below for some comments on your nice abstract.

Thanks,
Isaac

13. Either “studied as a function of [singular noun]” or “studied with jet 
selections ___” So e.g. “Of jet radius ($R = …$) and jet constituent pT 
selection (p_T^const…)” But given that in the next sentence you talk about 
the dependent variable of the plots being pT and \Delta R, maybe here it 
makes more sense to use the latter formulation to avoid redundancy. 
14.
         "> 2.0, 3.0 GeV/c"
        I usually use “cons” for constituents since “const” is a common 
abbreviation of “constant”. It’s not confusing for people in the field since 
it’s clear from context, but might as well avoid the risk altogether.
16. Do you mean published measurements here? If so would be good to specify 
“alongside published jet shapes…”

> On Oct 31, 2024, at 13:28, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> 
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> 
> Gabriel Dale-Gau (gdaleg2 AT uic.edu) has submitted a material for a review,  
> please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69826
> 
> Deadline: 2024-10-31
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov