STAR HardProbes PWG

[tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Jitka

  Please find my comments below:

Inclusive J/Psi RAA part, these two statement are not accurate
 Energy dependence can be described by the transport model -> energy 
dependence is qualitatively described by transport model.
  We can not concluded on RAA centrality dependence -> Hint of 
decreasing trend is more suitable
Psi(2S) part, do you want to conclude something on copper of STAR with 
NA51 and other experiment?
J/Psi in Jets Part, We can not say a light increase near z=1 with 
current error bars

Qian Yang

On 2024-11-22 04:21, Mooney, Isaac wrote:
> Hi Jitka,
>
> I think this is sufficient — it looks much better.
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac
>
> > On Nov 21, 2024, at 13:16, Mrazkova, Jitka
> > <jitka.mrazkova AT fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Isaac,
> >
> > thank you for your comments. I tried to reduce the amount of text
> > (and also increased the text size). Please let me know if I should
> > attempt to adjust it more.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jitka
> >
> > -------------------------
> >
> > From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> > <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Mooney, Isaac
> > <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 11:09 PM
> > To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for
> > Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
> >
> > Hi Jitka,
> >
> > One general comment on the poster is that it’s quite text-heavy.
> > Full sentences aren’t required, which may help you reduce the
> > wordiness, and make it easier to read from any reasonable distance.
> > I have some other specific comments below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Isaac
> >
> > Bottom-left: How do we get from the plot that “higher energies
> > show stronger [relative] suppression than small systems”? The
> > ALICE data at 5.02 TeV and STAR data at 200 GeV are about
> > consistent, and if anything the NA50 data at 17.3 GeV seems to
> > exhibit more relative suppression. The structure of the sentence
> > also doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.
> >
> > Top-right: The box “Production of J/psi vs Multiplicity”
> > doesn’t have any physics motivation. The "J/psi Production within
> > Jets” panel has a similar lack of motivation.
> >
> > > On Nov 20, 2024, at 12:31, Mrazkova, Jitka
> > > <jitka.mrazkova AT fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear conveners,
> > >
> > > I would like to kindly ask you for your comments on my poster for
> > > the Zimanyi School. (I was originally supposed to give a talk, but
> > > it has been changed to a poster.)
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Jitka Mrazkova
> > >
> > > -------------------------
> > >
> > > From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
> > > webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 6:18 PM
> > > To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > Subject: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for
> > > Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
> > >
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Jitka Mrazkova (jitkam7 AT seznam.cz) has submitted a material for a
> > > review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69948
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2024-12-02
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov