Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mrazkova, Jitka" <jitka.mrazkova AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
  • To: tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:54:13 +0000

Hi Qian,

thank you very much for your suggestion and help, and I apologize for my misunderstanding.
I uploaded the new version.

Best regards,
Jitka


From: tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:50 AM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Mrazkova, Jitka <jitka.mrazkova AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
 
Hi Jitka

  you can conclude on : Double ration is smaller in isobar system than
that in p+A system

For the time consideration, I will push your poster to star-talk. Please
implement my comments in a new version.


Qian Yang

On 2024-11-25 06:16, Mrazkova, Jitka wrote:
> Dear Qian,
>
>  thank you for your comments, I implemented them in the poster (v2).
>
>  I'm sorry, I'm just not entirely sure what you mean by the comment on
> the Psi(2S) part. Should I elaborate more on the difference between
> the ALICE vs STAR data (higher vs lower collision energies) or the
> p+(W, Ag) and d+Au systems (right part of the plot)? I wasn't sure
> what other conclusions to draw from the plot (so that they are correct
> and also not to add too much text) so I only included the mention
> about suppression in the STAR data so far.
>
>  Best regards
>  Jitka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of tc88qy
> <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 3:08 PM
> To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Cc: Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
> Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for
> Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
>
> Hello Jitka
>
>    Please find my comments below:
>
> Inclusive J/Psi RAA part, these two statement are not accurate
>   Energy dependence can be described by the transport model -> energy
> dependence is qualitatively described by transport model.
>    We can not concluded on RAA centrality dependence -> Hint of
> decreasing trend is more suitable
> Psi(2S) part, do you want to conclude something on copper of STAR with
>
> NA51 and other experiment?
> J/Psi in Jets Part, We can not say a light increase near z=1 with
> current error bars
>
> Qian Yang
>
> On 2024-11-22 04:21, Mooney, Isaac wrote:
>> Hi Jitka,
>>
>> I think this is sufficient — it looks much better.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Isaac
>>
>>> On Nov 21, 2024, at 13:16, Mrazkova, Jitka
>>> <jitka.mrazkova AT fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Isaac,
>>>
>>> thank you for your comments. I tried to reduce the amount of text
>>> (and also increased the text size). Please let me know if I should
>>> attempt to adjust it more.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jitka
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Mooney, Isaac
>>> <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 11:09 PM
>>> To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>> Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for
>>> Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
>>>
>>> Hi Jitka,
>>>
>>> One general comment on the poster is that it’s quite text-heavy.
>>> Full sentences aren’t required, which may help you reduce the
>>> wordiness, and make it easier to read from any reasonable distance.
>>> I have some other specific comments below.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Isaac
>>>
>>> Bottom-left: How do we get from the plot that “higher energies
>>> show stronger [relative] suppression than small systems”? The
>>> ALICE data at 5.02 TeV and STAR data at 200 GeV are about
>>> consistent, and if anything the NA50 data at 17.3 GeV seems to
>>> exhibit more relative suppression. The structure of the sentence
>>> also doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.
>>>
>>> Top-right: The box “Production of J/psi vs Multiplicity”
>>> doesn’t have any physics motivation. The "J/psi Production within
>>> Jets” panel has a similar lack of motivation.
>>>
>>>> On Nov 20, 2024, at 12:31, Mrazkova, Jitka
>>>> <jitka.mrazkova AT fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear conveners,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to kindly ask you for your comments on my poster for
>>>> the Zimanyi School. (I was originally supposed to give a talk, but
>>>> it has been changed to a poster.)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Jitka Mrazkova
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------
>>>>
>>>> From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
>>>> webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 6:18 PM
>>>> To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>> Subject: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jitka Mrazkova for
>>>> Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
>>>>
>>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>>
>>>> Jitka Mrazkova (jitkam7 AT seznam.cz) has submitted a material for a
>>>> review,
>>>> please have a look:
>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69948
>>>>
>>>> Deadline: 2024-12-02
>>>> ---
>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page