usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!
- From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
- To: Thomas Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu>
- Cc: "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:50:49 +0200
Hello all,
An update:
-6.4.1 and 6.4.3 look good to me. Please file 6.4 asap, should now be easy.
-6.6 and 6.6.1: For sMDT the report does not seem to have anything to do with the variance. The variance is the $389k in positive cost variance, but there's no word on that in the report...
-6.8 looks good
Thanks,
Gustaaf
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:00 PM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu <mailto:gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>> wrote:
Hello all,
A friendly reminder that March variance reports are due!
Here are some comments:
-6.4: nothing yet!?
-6.5: typo do => due; (other comments are in L3 parts below)
*6.5.1: the cumulative SV is below $100k, so no need to comment on
that (and we generally only comment when required); for the corrective
action I would replace "The variance will be corrected " with "The
accruals will be corrected "
*6.5.3: it's perfectly ok to copy from previous months, but is "The
pre-MREFC phase of the project is now nearing completion. " still
accurate?
-6.6 and 6.6.1 are missing
*6.6.3: what does the irradiation have to do with the cost variance?
"We did not hire an engineer and most design/test work was done by our
students. " is very problematic: to explain the contribution from
scientific labor, iit had to be made clear that there are two
*distinct*
categories of work: one done by engineers and techs, and one done by
physicists, and these do not overlap. If the students in question are
engineering students we're ok, but in any case we cannot write that.
Also, does that amount to $140k?
*6.6.5: maybe explicitly say September 2021 and November 2021?
-6.8 and 6.8.2 are missing
*6.8.3: NSF doesn't want it, so no need to put it in IPD, but can
you
comment by email on the positive cost variance?
Thanks!
Gustaaf
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
<mailto:Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
<https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l>
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 04/21/2021
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!,
Thomas Schwarz, 04/23/2021
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!,
Stephanie Majewski, 04/23/2021
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 04/23/2021
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 04/26/2021
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!,
Stephanie Majewski, 04/23/2021
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!,
Thomas Schwarz, 04/23/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.