Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports!
  • Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:59:24 -0400


Hello all,

A friendly reminder that March variance reports are due!

Here are some comments:

-6.4: nothing yet!?

-6.5: typo do => due; (other comments are in L3 parts below)
*6.5.1: the cumulative SV is below $100k, so no need to comment on that (and we generally only comment when required); for the corrective action I would replace "The variance will be corrected " with "The accruals will be corrected "
*6.5.3: it's perfectly ok to copy from previous months, but is "The pre-MREFC phase of the project is now nearing completion. " still accurate?

-6.6 and 6.6.1 are missing
*6.6.3: what does the irradiation have to do with the cost variance? "We did not hire an engineer and most design/test work was done by our students. " is very problematic: to explain the contribution from scientific labor, iit had to be made clear that there are two *distinct* categories of work: one done by engineers and techs, and one done by physicists, and these do not overlap. If the students in question are engineering students we're ok, but in any case we cannot write that. Also, does that amount to $140k?
*6.6.5: maybe explicitly say September 2021 and November 2021?

-6.8 and 6.8.2 are missing
*6.8.3: NSF doesn't want it, so no need to put it in IPD, but can you comment by email on the positive cost variance?

Thanks!

Gustaaf




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page