U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Stephanie Majewski <smajewsk AT uoregon.edu>]

Hi Gustaaf,

See responses below.

Stephanie

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 4:31 AM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hello all,

Thanks for the updates.

6.5 is good now.

-6.8: the you write "start-start instead of finish-finish” I think you mean "start-start instead of finish-start” no?

--> No, I actually meant finish-finish. The materials purchase task was meant to be completed by the end of a task to review heterogenous tool kits and platforms to investigate pipelines.

 

-6.8.2: I’m not sure what "There was an extended decision process which left some task for the baseline program behind as it became clear they would not be needed” means, but it doesn’t seem to be needed.  I would suggest to remove.  I don’t think what’s written under impact statement is an impact statement.  I think we want something along the lines of “Since this part of the project is complete, the $134k positive cost variance will remain.”

--> Ok, this has been updated.

 

-6.8.4: How was the fix tracked?  Did we do a BCP for this? 

--> This was implemented as a correction to BCP-1045 (see an email from Carrie in early April). I've added that to the description of the corrective action.

 

Thanks,

Gustaaf


> On Apr 25, 2022, at 9:15 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Thanks for the fixes.  Quick follow-up;
>
> -6.5: while you wait for Joey you can remove the sentence from 6.5 (since all other schedule variances are < 100k maybe just talking about 6.5.1 is enough)
>
> -good to hear the TDC has been submitted!
>
> -6.8, 6.8.2 and 6.8.4 are *still* missing
>
> Thx
>
> Gustaaf
>
>> On Apr 22, 2022, at 1:22 PM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Thanks for filing (most) variance reports on time.  This progress is much appreciated.  A few comments:
>>
>> -6.4.2: “to both” is probably a copy-paste leftover and should probably be removed
>>
>> -6.5: "is due to delayed invoicing of production PCB lot.” => does that mean things aren’t accrued properly?  (Also, 6.5.3 schedule variance is small, so maybe not actually worth talking about here?)
>> -6.5.3: "The invoices for manufacturing have not yet appeared” => but have things been delivered?  I guess since there is a positive cost variance.  If so, this is a mistake in accruals…
>>
>> -6.6 is good
>> -6.6.3: I’ll reiterate that on the TDC front, any statement like “will start in the next few months” has lost all credibility - hasn’t this been going on for almost a year now?  How likely is it this will actually happen in the next few months?
>> -6.6.5: only 7 months of remaining float?  Does that include the LS3 delay?
>>
>> -6.8, 6.8.2 and 6.8.4 are missing
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Gustaaf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
>> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!AV0FMTqQHTml2sj_30R9FBbA5mSX3tqXI5saxoIDuYCUlijJt9tUCdcOE7vbmuIBUv7ZjGePlGRJJGu3RTYZD1GdXPTO$
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!AV0FMTqQHTml2sj_30R9FBbA5mSX3tqXI5saxoIDuYCUlijJt9tUCdcOE7vbmuIBUv7ZjGePlGRJJGu3RTYZD1GdXPTO$
>

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!AV0FMTqQHTml2sj_30R9FBbA5mSX3tqXI5saxoIDuYCUlijJt9tUCdcOE7vbmuIBUv7ZjGePlGRJJGu3RTYZD1GdXPTO$