Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] June VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>, Junjie Zhu <junjie AT umich.edu>
  • Cc: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] June VRs
  • Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:56:31 +0200


Hello all,

It would be good if we could wrap this up today. We’re down to Andy, Haleh
and Junjie (aa now in the cc list).

Thx

Gustaaf

> On Jul 24, 2024, at 15:03, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> A follow-up:
>
>> -6.4.3 looks good, except for the very last sentence, that says the CV has
>> remained flat, when in fact it went up by 50%… I unlocked this.
>
> This still needs to be fixed.
>
>>
>> -6.5.4 is missing
>
> It’s there now, but only the schedule variance. We also need a cost
> variance report.
>
>>
>> -6.6: you’re again writing “the schedule variance is driven by… (xx% of
>> cost)…” please change that to “xx%” or “xx% of schedule” => I have
>> unlocked this
>> -6.6.3: the corrective action appears to refer to the old schedule
>> variance. It should be replace with “no corrective action needed.” I
>> have unlocked this
>
> These need to be resubmitted.
>
>>
>> -6.8 and 6.8.4 are missing
>
> These look good and I have approved them.
>
> Best,
>
> Gustaaf
>
>>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page