Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - RE: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] June VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Smith, Rosemarie" <rsmith2 AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "Zhu, Junjie" <junjie AT umich.edu>, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>, "usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: RE: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] June VRs
  • Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:06:59 +0000

Hi Junjie,

 

I had submitted yours for you for the comment Gustaaf needs was updated within.

 

Thank you,

Rosemarie

 

From: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Junjie Zhu
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:02 PM
To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Cc: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>; Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>; usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] June VRs

 

Gustaaf, there seems to be no button for me to submit it. I guess Anyes already submitted it for me. Sorry I was away for the past few days and just came back yesterday night.

 

Best,

Junjie

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Junjie Zhu

Professor of Physics, University of Michigan

450 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109

Office: +1 734-647-7201

Lab: +1 734-936-2868

Fax: +1 734-936-6529

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:56AM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:


Hello all,

It would be good if we could wrap this up today.  We’re down to Andy, Haleh and Junjie (aa now in the cc list).

Thx

Gustaaf

> On Jul 24, 2024, at 15:03, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> A follow-up:
>
>> -6.4.3 looks good, except for the very last sentence, that says the CV has remained flat, when in fact it went up by 50%… I unlocked this.
>
> This still needs to be fixed.
>
>>
>> -6.5.4 is missing
>
> It’s there now, but only the schedule variance.  We also need a cost variance report.
>
>>
>> -6.6: you’re again writing “the schedule variance is driven by… (xx% of cost)…”  please change that to “xx%” or “xx% of schedule” => I have unlocked this
>> -6.6.3: the corrective action appears to refer to the old schedule variance.  It should be replace with “no corrective action needed.”  I have unlocked this
>
> These need to be resubmitted.
>
>>
>> -6.8 and 6.8.4 are missing
>
> These look good and I have approved them.
>
> Best,
>
> Gustaaf
>
>>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page