U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

["Ma, Hong" <hma AT bnl.gov>]

Hi Tim,

 

                We had the similar problem with the DOE BOE table, that the level of details is very different from the previous one.

I asked Penka, she acknowledged that it was a mistake.   For DOE IPR, there was no change in the direct cost since the Directors Review in May.  The only difference is that they changed the labels of the column. So we simply change the labels, instead of replacing the table.

 

                I don’t think it is the case for NSF. We should ask Penka to make the right tables.

 

                Hong.

 

From: Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Tim Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM
To: John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>, "usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] BOE for NSF DR - question about tables

 

Hi John, 

 

I was just putting the new charts in the BOE and checking and updating numbers, but before I send it to docdb I have one question: The Cost Estimate table (1 DRFDR_NSF 6.04 L2 LAr BOE Tables 20190625) in docdb 840 has a lot less detail than before. Is that expected? Or am I missing it in a different file? thanks. 

 

best, Tim