Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] BOE for NSF DR - question about tables

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Novakova, Penka N" <penka AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "Parsons, John" <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>, "Ma, Hong" <hma AT bnl.gov>, Tim Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>, Gustaaf H Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: "usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] BOE for NSF DR - question about tables
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:47:58 +0000

Hi John,
Normally the BOE tables go to Task Group level but in the case of LAr there
are many missing task groups so the report just shows <Empty>. I am attaching
the report with the task groups. We can also add level 5 if this is something
you want. Let me know.
Thanks,
penka

-----Original Message-----
From: John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 3:32 PM
To: Ma, Hong <hma AT bnl.gov>; Tim Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>;
Gustaaf H Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Cc: usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov; Novakova, Penka N <penka AT bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] BOE for NSF DR - question about tables


Hi Penka,

Sorry to pester, but any word on these BOE tables? Do we go ahead
with what we have in docdb 840, or are new tables being made?
Thanks,
John

On 7/14/19 12:34 PM, John Parsons wrote:
>
> Hi Penka,
>
>     We have noticed the LAr BOE tables are much less detailed than
> the version we used for PDR.  Is that intentional?  Should we go ahead
> and use those tables?  (ie. in docdb 840)
>     Thanks,
>         John
>
> On 7/14/19 12:25 PM, Ma, Hong wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>>                  We had the similar problem with the DOE BOE table,
>> that the level of details is very different from the previous one.
>>
>> I asked Penka, she acknowledged that it was a mistake.   For DOE IPR,
>> there was no change in the direct cost since the Directors Review in
>> May.  The only difference is that they changed the labels of the
>> column. So we simply change the labels, instead of replacing the table.
>>
>>                  I don’t think it is the case for NSF. We should ask
>> Penka to make the right tables.
>>
>>                  Hong.
>>
>> *From: *Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l
>> <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Tim
>> Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>
>> *Date: *Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM
>> *To: *John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>,
>> "usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov"
>> <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>> *Subject: *[Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] BOE for NSF DR - question about
>> tables
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I was just putting the new charts in the BOE and checking and
>> updating numbers, but before I send it to docdb I have one question:
>> The Cost Estimate table (1 DRFDR_NSF 6.04 L2 LAr BOE Tables 20190625)
>> in docdb
>> 840 has a lot less detail than before. Is that expected? Or am I
>> missing it in a different file? thanks.
>>
>> best, Tim
>>
>

--
______________________________________________________________________

John Parsons
Nevis Labs, Email: parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu
Columbia University Phone: (914) 591-2820
P.O. Box 137 Fax: (914) 591-8120
Irvington, NY 10533 WWW:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nevis.columbia.edu_-7Eparsons_&d=DwIDaQ&c=aTOVZmpUfPKZuaG9NO7J7Mh6imZbfhL47t9CpZ-pCOw&r=UENrYTOIs8Bh1NYw40_P-g&m=FrtDABCoKXdm3mJmmXuwKbgj9TVONA6bYchaPCerFXw&s=9lBK5DGhekx_FVJojC23l4ofS8-6eJyC6uS3UnG8DWU&e=


______________________________________________________________________

Attachment: 1 DRFDR_NSF 6.04 L2 LAr BOE Tables 20190625v.1.xlsx
Description: 1 DRFDR_NSF 6.04 L2 LAr BOE Tables 20190625v.1.xlsx




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page