STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Prabhupada
I sign off your nice abstract, with one minor comment that your last sentence 
might be 
a little too long, so that you could split into two parts in addition to what 
is mentioned by 
Prithwish and Jiangyong. 
Best regards, ShinIchi

> 2021/02/04 3:47、Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l 
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:
> 
> Hi Prabhupada,
>  Thanks for considering my comments. The new version looks good. A few more 
> suggestions:
> 
>  "AuAu data sets"
> -->
>  "Au+Au datasets"
> 
>  "some physics implications of such measurements"
> -->
>  "physics implications of our measurements"
> 
>  "in order to study"
> -->
>   "in the context of"
> 
>  "with energy are discussed"
> -->
>  "with collision energy will be discussed"
> 
> 
> Best,
> Prithwish
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2021-02-03 13:38, pdixit wrote:
>> On 2021-02-03 22:46, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>>> Hello Prabhupada,
>>>   Nice abstract, please include the following comments in the next
>>> version. What that I sign off.
>>> General comment:
>>> The abstract is in a good shape. We can sharpen it a bit more by
>>> emphasizing the new results at this conference which are for Ξ and Ω
>>> and for v3. You can move the comparison to older data at the end where
>>> you say "results will be compared to other data". Also, we can try to
>>> align it to the theme of the conference.
>>> "(multi)strange" --> "multi-strange" everywhere
>>> "early stage in"
>>> -->
>>> "early stages of"
>>> "we will present the second"
>>> -->
>>> "we will present new results on the second"
>>> "(multi)strange hadrons such as K_S^0, φ, Λ, Ξ and Ω"
>>> -->
>>> "multi-strange hadrons such as φ, Ξ and Ω"
>>> "transport-based model"
>>> -->
>>> "transport model"
>>> "Finally, the result will be compared to other RHIC energies of beam
>>> energy scan.."
>>> -->
>>> "Finally, we will show comparison of the new results with the existing
>>> data on other particle species (π^±, K^± , K_S^0, Λ) and energies from
>>> beam energy scan.."
>>> "and some physics implications of such measurements are discussed"
>>> You need to revise this line and make a more concrete statement about
>>> the physics of this analysis that aligns with the theme of the CPOD
>>> conference.
>>> Best,
>>> Prithwish
>>> On 2021-02-03 07:01, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>>>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>> Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a material 
>>>> for a
>>>> review, please have a look:
>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53584
>>>> ---
>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>> Hi Prithwish,
>> Thank you so much for the suggestions and comments. One of the themes
>> of the CPOD conference is Deconfined Matter. My abstract is related to
>> this topic. I have implemented all your suggestions please have look
>> at my modified abstract in the given link below.
>> link: 
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/abstract_version_3_0.pdf
>> Thank You
>> Prabhupada
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l