STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Niseem <niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com>]

Hi Prithwish,

Thanks for your nice comments, please find my updated slides at the same 
link

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/aps-april-meeting-2021/characterization-quadrupole-charge-separation-200-gev-implicati

>>slide#7 Mention how centrality was done.

I did not understand what you mean do i need to say that we do 
centrality by cutting on multiplicity?

For the AMPT data I'm using the a published plots which i added 
reference to it.


Thanks,
Niseem



On 4/13/21 4:01 PM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Hello Niseem,
>   The slides look good. I have a few comments -- with these included I 
> sign off.
>
> Since you have new preliminary results please follow the STAR policy 
> of making a page (if you haven't done so yet). Regarding the model 
> plots, I would also request you to make the AMPT data available on RCF 
> somewhere.
>
> General comments:
> 1. I think we need to make a point that this analysis is promising and 
> still in the exploratory phase as we need more time to explore the 
> sensitivity to different background scenarios. Maybe some help from 
> the theorists would be welcome. Also, isobar data may help to 
> establish the efficacy of the observable. It would be great if you can 
> add a few comments along these lines.
>
> 2. Please make sure not only every plot but each panel has a label 
> saying either "STAR Preliminary" or "AMPT".
>
> 3. Put more details about the AMPT model on the slides. In particular, 
> the version, link to publications wherever applicable.
>
> Specific comments on the slides:
>
> slide#4: "Prior/ongoing" --> "Prior"
>
>  "make more discerning" --> "make a discerning"
>
> slide#6: You need to define what "f" (or "f_q") is.
> What is the value of "f" on lower right plot ?
>
> slide#7 "Run-11 data" --> "data from year 2011"
> Mention how centrality was done.
>
> slide #8:
> "The correlator response in " --> "The correlator response to" (this 
> sounds better)
>
> slide#9: Put the centrality for AMPT on this plot.
>
> Slide#10:
> Somewhere on this slide you need to put a quantitative statement. How 
> about:
> "Variation of q_2 leading to ~30% variation of v_2 in 10-30% 
> centrality does not lead to any significant variation of R_{Ψ2}" ?
>
> Slide#11:
> Left plot inset requires more labels for x and y axes.
>
> Slide#12:
> This is the best place to put the comment on the exploratory nature of 
> this study and add that more model  studies on sensitivity to 
> background underway after the last bullet.
>
> Best,
> Prithwish
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2021-04-10 15:53, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman (niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com) has 
> > submitted a
> > material for a review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/54618
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l