star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review
- From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Andrew Tamis <andrew.tamis AT yale.edu>
- Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 08:30:01 +0530
Hello Andrew,
Please find my additional comments.
Line#2: In title , "…GeV in STAR" -> looks like there are extra space between "GeV__in__STAR", would you please check this?
Line#19: p+p -> $p+p$ (italic)
Line#19-20: " This talk will present analysis done with jets reconstructed.. " -> "This talk will present a measurement of jets reconstructed…"
Line#22: "…approximately …" -> Not sure why it is required to mention "approximately" here? Is there any reason?
8. I use N-point as it is what the attached reference i used calledOk, That is fine.
them, I think it may be better to maintain cohesion
10. By Scaling behavior, I mean the expected shape of the curve inI was trying to understand this "scaling behavior" from that paper; I will read it again later.
that region due to theory predictions. It is the language used in my
reference, should I do more to introduce it here? Perhaps I can just
change it to curve shape.
At this moment you can just keep it as it is.
Regards,
Nihar
On 2022-06-18 02:37, Andrew Tamis wrote:
Hello Nihar,
Thank you very much for the feedback!
1. Done
2. Done
3. Done
4. Done
5. Done
6. Done
7. Done, and attached reference
8. I use N-point as it is what the attached reference i used called
them, I think it may be better to maintain cohesion
9. Done
10. By Scaling behavior, I mean the expected shape of the curve in
that region due to theory predictions. It is the language used in my
reference, should I do more to introduce it here? Perhaps I can just
change it to curve shape.
11. By the time of the talk, I may not have unfolding ready at a level
that I am willing to show, but I still believe it is helpful to
mention that I will show data, and the sentence mentioning "first
studies" may be vague enough to not overrepresent what I will be
bringing. I believe that showing that the detector level data
exhibits the same behavior to constituent pt cuts as the PYTHIA
simulations contains useful information.
12. Done
13. Done
14. Done
15. Done
16. Done
17. Done
I have made these changes and several others that were suggested. The
updated abstract is here
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/DNP-2022/Correlators-pp-Collisions-Sqrts200GeV-STAR
Thank you,
Andrew Tamis
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 6:14 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
Thank you for your plan to perform this new measurement in STAR.
Please find my comment and suggestions on your abstract.
1. Title- "Correlators in pp Collisions at √s = 200GeV from STAR"
I think title needs more information to convey about "N-particle
energy
correlator in jet".
Something like "Measurement of energy correlators within jet in p+p
collisions at √s = 200GeV in STAR"
Or "Measurement of 2-particle energy correlators within jet in p+p
collisions at √s = 200GeV in STAR"
2. Andrew Tamis -> Andrew Tamis (for the STAR collaboration)
3. "Within high energy collisions, Jets are a unique…"
-> "Jet is a unique…hard-scattered quarks and gluons in high
energy
collision experiment."
4."…in Jet-finding…" -> "… in jet-finding.."
5."..allow for increased study…" -> "…allow for detailed
study…"
6."…the quark/gluon shower, fragmentation, and
the resulting final hadrons." -> "the quark/gluon shower,
fragmentation,
and the hadronization in the Quantum-Chromodynamics."
7. "…within jets defines an observable that probes…" -> need to
introduce here what is that observable ? For example, "…within
jets
defines an observable, the N-particle energy correlator in jet, that
probes…" ; the introduction of this observable may need reference
so
please provide reference of previous study.
8. "N-point" -> "N-particle" would be clearer.
9. "re-contextualize" -> "recontextualize"
10. "By plotting the 2-point energy correlator as a function of
opening
angle, one can determine the crossover region from where the scaling
behavior of the correlator changes from scaling as a random
distribution
of hadrons at low opening angles, to scaling as quarks and gluons
dominated by perturbative interactions at large opening angles." ->
Please break this statement and paraphrase it. Not sure what is this
"scaling"?
11. Second para, I would prefer to start with "In this talk, the
study
of 2-point energy correlator in jet will be discussed using PYTHIA
and
STAR grant simulation using kinematic coverage of the STAR
experiment."
(Or Something similar to this) So that we will not be saying
explicitly
to show the results from p+p data at this moment in the abstract.
But at
the end this abstract, you could mention STAR plan to perform this
analysis where you could show some preliminary plots in your talk if
you
could have by that time. [I think this what we discussed at our last
meeting]. Please let me know what do you think.
12. "The correlation functions were approximated.." -> "The
correlation
functions are approximate…"
13. "…y-φ space…" -> "… rapidity-azimuthal angle phase
space…"
14. "…approximated via multiplicity histograms of the opening
angle…" ->
"…approximated by the distribution of the opening angle…
15. "simulations in PYTHIA" -> "simulation using PYTHIA"
16. "selections on overall" -> "selections on the overall"
17. "pT" -> "transverse momentum ($ p_{\rm T}$)"
Regards,
Nihar
On 2022-06-11 02:10, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,a
Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for
review,_______________________________________________
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59931
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
webmaster, 06/10/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/11/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 06/13/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Nihar Sahoo, 06/14/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 06/13/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 06/20/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 06/20/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 06/21/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Nihar Sahoo, 06/24/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Andrew Tamis, 06/24/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 06/24/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Andrew Tamis, 06/29/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Nihar Sahoo, 06/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Rongrong Ma, 06/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 06/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 06/21/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 06/20/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 06/20/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for DNP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/11/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.