STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Tamis,

It is a good study on this new observable.
AFA Pythia study is concern, I don't have any comments.
I have some minor comments on your data analysis slides.

_ Before SLide14, you could introduce STAR detector system and what are 
the detectors you plan to use for your measurement? A short intro is 
sufficient.

Slide14:
_ pp Run12 -> pp sqrt(s)=200 GeV (year 2012)
_Trigger - JP2 -> As no one know what is JP2, so it would be good to 
mention "Jet patch trigger" (here 2 is not necessary for outside world 
as you describe details about this trigger in sub-bullet)
_ Constituent PT ->  Constituent Transverse momentum, p_{T}
_Official Embedding, PYTHIA 6  -> PYTHIA6+STAR Géant simulation

Slide15:
_ Please include "pp sqrt(s) =200 GeV" as legend
_ Detector level data retains trends in jet momentum selection -> 
Detector level data retains trends in jet p_{T} selection

Slide16:
_Interesting behavior in response to pT cuts -> PYTHIA6 simulation: EEC 
shows a dependence on jet p_{T}
_Robust to pT-independent tracking efficiency effects -> should we say 
this a "robust" or "mild" "negligible" pT-dependent ?
   We have not checked yet with pT-dependent tracking efficiency. 
(Slide13)
_ last two bullets "Detector-Level measurement done in STAR p+p run 12  
and Unfolding in progress " I would just say combining "First 
measurement of ECC in pp sqrt(s)=200 GeV is in progress in STAR"


Cheers
Nihar

On 2022-10-17 23:00, Andrew Tamis via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi Sooraj,
>
> I think I would like to show the PYTHIA results and performance plots
> and hold off on a preliminary request until I get farther along with
> unfolding.  Do you mean that I should show the performance plots of
> detector level data without the comparison to PYTHIA/Geant?
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:59 AM Sooraj Radhakrishnan via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> > Thanks for preparing these nice slides. Since you show detector
> > level and generator level PYTHIA distribution are quite similar, I
> > wonder if the results should be labelled STAR Preliminary, as they
> > can be argued to be close to the physics results. Do you want to
> > show the data also at DNP or just the PYTHIA results and give some
> > performance plots for data?
> >
> > thanks
> > Sooraj
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 6:27 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for
> > > a review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61351
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2022-10-27
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> >
> > --
> >
> > Sooraj Radhakrishnan
> >
> > Research Scientist,
> > Department of Physics
> >
> > Kent State University
> > Kent, OH 44243
> >
> > Physicist Postdoctoral AffiliateNuclear Science Division
> > Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
> > MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
> > Berkeley, CA 94720
> > Ph: 510-495-2473 [1]
> >
> > Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] tel:%28510%29%20495-2473
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l