STAR HardProbes PWG

[Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>]

Hi Veronika,

I have minor comments on your nice slides, and sign off.

- s4: the rectangular boxes look a bit weird. I would suggest to indicate the Low EA and High EA as shaded areas under the histogram.

- s9: the figure misses the "STAR Preliminary" label, system, energy and jet requirements information.

Cheers,

Barbara

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 7:50 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Veronica,

Thank you for your reply.
I don't have further comments.

Enjoy DNP2022!

Cheers
Nihar

On 2022-10-18 04:56, Veronica Verkest wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> I appreciate your helpful comments. We discussed them in our group
> meeting today and made some changes. I will address some points:
>
>> Slide 2:
>>
>> I believe that EA and UE are a bit more nuanced to define (e.g. how
>> I measure them), so I think it is best to leave them slightly
>> ambiguous in the motivation slide. I do indicate that they are
>> measures of soft particle production, and that is the main message.
>>
>> Slide 3:
>>
>> We previewed the slide in this format and it just looks a little
>> busy with the 2 titles so close. This also allows me to make both
>> the image and text as large as possible.
>>
>> Slide 9:
>>
>> This image is a placeholder--I intend to show only the red and
>> purple points as before. I will update the PDF once I get that
>> image.
>>
>> Slide 10:
>>
>> Now I have changed it to show a comparison between pp and p+Au
>
> I have updated the slides at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322. As always, feedback is
> welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Veronica
>
>> On Oct 16, 2022, at 8:28 AM, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hello Veronica,
>>
>> Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides.
>> With these implemented, I sign off.
>>
>> Slide2:
>> "thought too small to form QGP" -> "thought too small in size to
>> form QGP"
>> It would be good if you could define EA and UE (or give reference).
>>
>> Slide3:
>> "Solenoidal Tracker At RHIC:…" -> Can you bring that to the top of
>> the STAR detector pic?
>>
>> Slide4: "iBBCEsum " -> is this "inner east beam-beam counter signal
>> sum" ? Then introduce there first.
>> Slide6: ET -> Transversr energy (E_T)
>>
>> SLide10:
>> "Consistent with QCD predictions and jet mass measured in p+p [Phys.
>> Rev. D 104, 052007 ]
>> Not sure how do we draw this conclusion.
>> 1_ We have not compared any QCD calculation here for p+A collisions.
>> 2_ Above p+p results are between jet pT 20-25, 30-40 GeV/c, Not the
>> same kinematic range.
>> And there is also no comparison plot between pp and pA jet
>> mass.
>> If you have such comparison plot, please include that.
>> Otherwise, I would suggest just drop the above statement "
>> Consistent with ….".
>>
>> Cheers
>> Nihar
>>
>> On 2022-10-14 03:24, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>>> Veronica Verkest (vverkest AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for
>>> a review,
>>
>>> please have a look:
>>
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322
>>
>>> Deadline: 2022-10-27
>>
>>> ---
>>
>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>
>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>
>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l