Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Veronica Verkest for DNP 2022 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Veronica Verkest <vverkest AT gmail.com>
  • To: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Veronica Verkest for DNP 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:26:16 -0400

Hi Nihar,

I appreciate your helpful comments. We discussed them in our group meeting today and made some changes. I will address some points:

Slide 2:
I believe that EA and UE are a bit more nuanced to define (e.g. how I measure them), so I think it is best to leave them slightly ambiguous in the motivation slide. I do indicate that they are measures of soft particle production, and that is the main message. 

Slide 3:
We previewed the slide in this format and it just looks a little busy with the 2 titles so close. This also allows me to make both the image and text as large as possible. 

Slide 9:
This image is a placeholder--I intend to show only the red and purple points as before. I will update the PDF once I get that image.

Slide 10:
Now I have changed it to show a comparison between pp and p+Au


I have updated the slides at https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322. As always, feedback is welcome.

Thanks,
Veronica

On Oct 16, 2022, at 8:28 AM, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Veronica,

Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides.
With these implemented, I sign off.

Slide2:
"thought too small to form QGP" -> "thought too small in size to form QGP"
It would be good if you could define EA and UE (or give reference).

Slide3:
"Solenoidal Tracker At RHIC:…" -> Can you bring that to the top of the STAR detector pic?

Slide4: "iBBCEsum " -> is this "inner east beam-beam counter signal sum" ? Then introduce there first.
Slide6: ET -> Transversr energy (E_T)

SLide10:
"Consistent with QCD predictions and jet mass measured in p+p [Phys. Rev. D 104, 052007 ]
Not sure how do we draw this conclusion.
1_ We have not compared any QCD calculation here for p+A collisions.
2_ Above p+p results are between jet pT 20-25, 30-40 GeV/c, Not the same kinematic range.
    And there is also no comparison plot between pp and pA jet mass.
If you have such comparison plot, please include that.
Otherwise, I would suggest just drop the above statement " Consistent with ….".


Cheers
Nihar


On 2022-10-14 03:24, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Veronica Verkest (vverkest AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322
Deadline: 2022-10-27
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page