STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Veronica,

Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides.
With these implemented, I sign off.

Slide2:
"thought too small to form QGP" -> "thought too small in size to form 
QGP"
It would be good if you could define EA and UE (or give reference).

Slide3:
"Solenoidal Tracker At RHIC:…" -> Can you bring that to the top of the 
STAR detector pic?

Slide4: "iBBCEsum " -> is this "inner east beam-beam counter signal sum" 
? Then introduce there first.
Slide6: ET -> Transversr energy (E_T)

SLide10:
"Consistent with QCD predictions and jet mass measured in p+p [Phys. 
Rev. D 104, 052007 ]
Not sure how do we draw this conclusion.
1_ We have not compared any QCD calculation here for p+A collisions.
2_ Above p+p results are between jet pT 20-25, 30-40 GeV/c, Not the same 
kinematic range.
     And there is also no comparison plot between pp and pA jet mass.
If you have such comparison plot, please include that.
Otherwise, I would suggest just drop the above statement " Consistent 
with ….".


Cheers
Nihar


On 2022-10-14 03:24, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Veronica Verkest (vverkest AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a 
> review,
> please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322
>
> Deadline: 2022-10-27
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l