STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Veronica,

Thank you for your reply.
I don't have further comments.

Enjoy DNP2022!

Cheers
Nihar

On 2022-10-18 04:56, Veronica Verkest wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> I appreciate your helpful comments. We discussed them in our group
> meeting today and made some changes. I will address some points:
>
> > Slide 2:
> >
> > I believe that EA and UE are a bit more nuanced to define (e.g. how
> > I measure them), so I think it is best to leave them slightly
> > ambiguous in the motivation slide. I do indicate that they are
> > measures of soft particle production, and that is the main message.
> >
> > Slide 3:
> >
> > We previewed the slide in this format and it just looks a little
> > busy with the 2 titles so close. This also allows me to make both
> > the image and text as large as possible.
> >
> > Slide 9:
> >
> > This image is a placeholder--I intend to show only the red and
> > purple points as before. I will update the PDF once I get that
> > image.
> >
> > Slide 10:
> >
> > Now I have changed it to show a comparison between pp and p+Au
>
> I have updated the slides at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322. As always, feedback is
> welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Veronica
>
> > On Oct 16, 2022, at 8:28 AM, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hello Veronica,
> >
> > Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides.
> > With these implemented, I sign off.
> >
> > Slide2:
> > "thought too small to form QGP" -> "thought too small in size to
> > form QGP"
> > It would be good if you could define EA and UE (or give reference).
> >
> > Slide3:
> > "Solenoidal Tracker At RHIC:…" -> Can you bring that to the top of
> > the STAR detector pic?
> >
> > Slide4: "iBBCEsum " -> is this "inner east beam-beam counter signal
> > sum" ? Then introduce there first.
> > Slide6: ET -> Transversr energy (E_T)
> >
> > SLide10:
> > "Consistent with QCD predictions and jet mass measured in p+p [Phys.
> > Rev. D 104, 052007 ]
> > Not sure how do we draw this conclusion.
> > 1_ We have not compared any QCD calculation here for p+A collisions.
> > 2_ Above p+p results are between jet pT 20-25, 30-40 GeV/c, Not the
> > same kinematic range.
> > And there is also no comparison plot between pp and pA jet
> > mass.
> > If you have such comparison plot, please include that.
> > Otherwise, I would suggest just drop the above statement "
> > Consistent with ….".
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2022-10-14 03:24, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > > Veronica Verkest (vverkest AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for
> > > a review,
> >
> > > please have a look:
> >
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61322
> >
> > > Deadline: 2022-10-27
> >
> > > ---
> >
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> >
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> >
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l