U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>]

My mistake, I misinterpreted Toms message. Ignore my previous message.

 

From: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Michael Tuts
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 9:47 AM
To: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] FW: March 1-2 Director’s Review Homework Questions

 

Hi All,

As you can see below the Committee might want someone(s) to talk to the milestone table, so please be prepared to do that if need be.

Mike

 

From: LeCompte, Tom <lecompte AT slac.stanford.edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 9:39 AM
To: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>
Cc: Victor Krabbendam <VKrabbendam AT lsst.org>; Gutta, Rajendra Rao <rgutta AT bnl.gov>; Marco Verzocchi (marco.verzocchi AT gmail.com) <marco.verzocchi AT gmail.com>; Sarah Eno <eno AT umd.edu>; Ted Liu (thliu AT fnal.gov) <thliu AT fnal.gov>; Darin Acosta <dea6 AT rice.edu>; Alexei N. Safonov <safonov AT tamu.edu>; Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov>; us-atlas-hllhc-pmgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov; Meyer, Chris <cjmey AT iu.edu>
Subject: Re: March 1-2 Director’s Review Homework Questions

 

Thanks!

I see 1-2 years of delay per task.  I'm assuming that's right.

It might be more efficient to post the 5 slides and to go over one or a few of them in detail. I'll leave it to you to decide, depending on the message and the differences between subprojects.

On 3/2/2023 8:19 AM, Michael Tuts wrote:

Hi Tom,

 

We have posted answers and a spreadsheet (on the milestone question) in the Q&A session.

 

 

Our plan at the session currently would be that I drive the slides and ask the responders to address the posted answers:

1. Q1 – just point you to the Excel file
2. Q2 – Chris could speak to these (5 slides)
3. Q3 – Gustaaf could speak to that slide
4. Q4 – I could speak to the subaward management (2 slides) and Hal could speak to the System Engineering/Interface question (2 slides)

 

Sound ok?

 

Cheers, Mike

 

From: LeCompte, Tom <lecompte AT slac.stanford.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:19 PM
To: Michael Tuts <tuts AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Cc: Victor Krabbendam <VKrabbendam AT lsst.org>; Gutta, Rajendra Rao <rgutta AT bnl.gov>; Marco Verzocchi (marco.verzocchi AT gmail.com) <marco.verzocchi AT gmail.com>; Sarah Eno <eno AT umd.edu>; Ted Liu (thliu AT fnal.gov) <thliu AT fnal.gov>; Darin Acosta <dea6 AT rice.edu>; Alexei N. Safonov <safonov AT tamu.edu>; Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov>
Subject: March 1-2 Director’s Review Homework Questions

 

Hi Mike-

We have just a handful of questions:

1. We would like to see a high-level (say Levels 1 and 2) milestone-based  comparison ofthe  original and revised schedules.
2. We saw graphs of the schedule distributions from Monte Carlo runs; we would like to see similar graphs for cost
3. We would like to see a table with four columns - original base and contingency and revised base and contingency. Rows should be at the the L2 level of detail.
4. Please prepare a few slides to address Question K, "Is
5. the project adhering to best practices in systems engineering, interface management, and subaward management?:

This should not sum up to more than a few slides.

The expectation is that Management, Cost & Schedule will not meet tomorrow, and instead people will join the various technical subcommittees. If this is a problem, let me know and we can adjust.

If you have questions, please email me or call at 331-803-0446.

Cheers,

Tom