sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document
- From: Marzia Rosati <marziarosati AT gmail.com>
- To: Gunther M Roland <rolandg AT mit.edu>, "sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:57:22 -0500
Gunther et al.,
attached is a the upsilon efficiency vs pt for all 3 eta ranges to be used as the right hand side plot in figure 1.4.
I am not sure what is meant by line 124-126. "While these losses are not catastrophic, it is worth noting that within the sPHENIX run plan a 25% loss is equal to the statistics collected in one of the RHIC run periods".
As far as I understand this statement is not correct. The acceptance in PHENIX is about 18 times smaller than sPHENIX so we our stats are much smaller. STAR has a similar acceptance to sPHENIX but readout much slower and limited PiD so I don't think they ever collected upsilon samples in any beam species (pp AuAu) which are 1/4 of the expected sPHENIX stats.
Best regards
Marzia
On 10/23/17 5:54 PM, Gunther M Roland wrote:
A friendly reminder that comments on this important document are still being
accepted! Thanks to everyone who shared their thoughts/corrections already.
We will work on an updated draft tomorrow and then take it from there.
Best,
Gunther and Dave
On Oct 21, 2017, at 12:02 AM, Gunther M Roland <rolandg AT mit.edu> wrote:
Friends,
As discussed at the General Meeting today, we are forwarding draft 1 of our
document outlining the detector scope for a $32M cost cap. The pdf file can
be found at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5wyutbndogozm5q/sPH-GEN-2017-002_v1.pdf?dl=0
(we'll provide another link tomorrow for those that can't access dropbox)
Please send your comments in reply to this mail, keeping the
[sPH-GEN-2017-002] tag in the subject line***. Comments received by
close-of-business on Monday, 10/23, will be most useful.
Cheers,
Gunther and Dave
***we will move future reviews to an sphenix-notes-l AT bnl.gov list, but the
list couldn't be generated in time for this note.
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l
.
Attachment:
upsilon-sphenix-effpt.png
Description: PNG image
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document
, (continued)
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, David Morrison, 10/22/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Martin Purschke, 10/22/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, Nils Feege, 10/23/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, John Lajoie, 10/23/2017
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Jamie Nagle, 10/23/2017
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Aaron Angerami, 10/23/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, John Lajoie, 10/23/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Aaron Angerami, 10/23/2017
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Jamie Nagle, 10/23/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, Sickles, Anne M, 10/23/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Marzia Rosati, 10/23/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, Gunther M Roland, 10/23/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Rosi Reed, 10/24/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
woody, 10/24/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Gunther M Roland, 10/24/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, Rosi Reed, 10/24/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
John Haggerty, 10/24/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, Edward Kistenev, 10/24/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document, Gunther M Roland, 10/24/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
Gunther M Roland, 10/24/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-l] [sPH-GEN-2017-002] Collaboration comments on 2017 descoping document,
woody, 10/24/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.