sPHENIX tracking discussion

["ming AT bnl.gov" <mxliu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi John，Yasuyuki and all,
I am having a technical problem connecting my Linux to Wireless here in Korea.
I will continue working on the draft as soon as the problem resolved.
Sorry about the delay. 
Cheers,
Ming

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
  Original Message  
From: John Haggerty
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 10:39 AM
To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

I agree the organization could be better, and it's really up to you guys 
what's easier, but it seems to me a higher priority to get as much 
factual information in the document as possible and reorganize it later, 
so that we have in front of us as much information as possible.

On 10/15/15 8:46 PM, Yasuyuki Akiba wrote:
> Dear Tony and all,
>
> If someone takes the edit token to do so, the reorganization can be done
> in one hour or so. It is just to move the exiting subsections. Once it
> is done, it would be much easier to edit each of the subsections.
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Y. Akiba
>
> *From:*Frawley, Anthony [mailto:afrawley AT fsu.edu]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:41 PM
> *To:* Yasuyuki Akiba <akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> *Cc:* Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
> *Subject:* RE: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>
> Hi Al,
>
> I think reorganizing would be a bad idea right now. The silicon tracker
> description and simulations need a lot of work, and I don't think we
> have the option of not doing it. I am running some simulations, and I am
> just now starting to edit the silicon parts of the tracker section. So I
> agree with Tom - let's focus on completing it, and reorganize it later.
>
> Tony
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
> [sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Yasuyuki Akiba
> [akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:02 PM
> *To:* hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu
> <mailto:hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>;
> sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>
> Dear Tom and all,
>
> ØThere is one outstanding comment about organization. We have broken
> each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
> ...) into pieces; one for each technology. There is a comment that this
> is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth between
> technology options. I agree with the comment
>
> I also agree with the comment. The current organization is crazy. We
> should change it immediately. I think someone should take the edit token
> now and re-arrange the section so that each technology has one
> continuous subsection. Any volunteer?
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Y. Akiba
>
> *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
> [mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] *On Behalf Of *Thomas
> K Hemmick
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:19 PM
> *To:* sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> *Subject:* [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>
> Hi all
>
> I have responded to most of the comments from PMG regarding the TPC
> sections of the tracking chapter. Explicitly these include comments
> about available manpower and experience with MAPS detectors. Both of
> these comments enhance the document since the answers are helpful to our
> case.
>
> There is one outstanding comment about organization. We have broken
> each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
> ...) into pieces; one for each technology. There is a comment that this
> is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth between
> technology options. I agree with the comment, but it would be pretty
> invasive to try a major rearrangement while people are live editing.
> Therefore, I'm tempted to skip compliance with that request until after
> the C&S review.
>
> Comments?
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.
>


-- 
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358
_______________________________________________
Sphenix-tracking-l mailing list
Sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l