sPHENIX tracking discussion

["Frawley, Anthony" <afrawley AT fsu.edu>]

I am having trouble pushing changes to the repository. Every time I do a pull 
and then push, the push fails and I am told to do a pull again - at which 
point I find new changes to the tracker section.

Any suggestions?

Thanks
Tony
________________________________________
From: sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov 
[sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Itaru Nakagawa 
[itaru AT bnl.gov]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 10:28 PM
To: John Haggerty; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

It's getting late in east coast. Can I keep editing another 1.5 hours?
-itaru

On 2015/10/17 11:22, John Haggerty wrote:
> Itaru,
>
> No, I'm doing some editing on other chapters, type away and let me
> know when you're done.
>
> On 10/16/15 10:10 PM, Itaru Nakagawa wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>   Have you released the draft already?
>> I am wondering if I still have a chance to modify the draft.
>> I am in the middle of edition and planning to work at least next a
>> couple of hours.
>> -itaru
>>
>> On 2015/10/16 10:39, John Haggerty wrote:
>>> I agree the organization could be better, and it's really up to you
>>> guys
>>> what's easier, but it seems to me a higher priority to get as much
>>> factual information in the document as possible and reorganize it
>>> later,
>>> so that we have in front of us as much information as possible.
>>>
>>> On 10/15/15 8:46 PM, Yasuyuki Akiba wrote:
>>>> Dear Tony and all,
>>>>
>>>> If someone takes the edit token to do so, the reorganization can be
>>>> done
>>>> in one hour or so. It is just to move the exiting subsections. Once it
>>>> is done, it would be much easier to edit each of the subsections.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>
>>>>                 Y. Akiba
>>>>
>>>> *From:*Frawley, Anthony [mailto:afrawley AT fsu.edu]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:41 PM
>>>> *To:* Yasuyuki Akiba <akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
>>>> hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> *Cc:* Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Al,
>>>>
>>>> I think reorganizing would be a bad idea right now. The silicon
>>>> tracker
>>>> description and simulations need a lot of work, and I don't think we
>>>> have the option of not doing it. I am running some simulations, and
>>>> I am
>>>> just now starting to edit the silicon parts of the tracker section.
>>>> So I
>>>> agree with Tom - let's focus on completing it, and reorganize it
>>>> later.
>>>>
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>> [sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Yasuyuki Akiba
>>>> [akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:02 PM
>>>> *To:* hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu
>>>> <mailto:hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>;
>>>> sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>>>
>>>> Dear Tom and all,
>>>>
>>>> ØThere is one outstanding comment about organization.  We have broken
>>>> each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
>>>> ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that
>>>> this
>>>> is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
>>>> between
>>>> technology options. I agree with the comment
>>>>
>>>> I also agree with the comment. The current organization is crazy. We
>>>> should change it immediately. I think someone should take the edit
>>>> token
>>>> now and re-arrange the section so that each technology has one
>>>> continuous subsection. Any volunteer?
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>
>>>>                 Y. Akiba
>>>>
>>>> *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>> [mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] *On Behalf Of
>>>> *Thomas
>>>> K Hemmick
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:19 PM
>>>> *To:* sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>> *Subject:* [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> I have responded to most of the comments from PMG regarding the TPC
>>>> sections of the tracking chapter.  Explicitly these include comments
>>>> about available manpower and experience with MAPS detectors.  Both of
>>>> these comments enhance the document since the answers are helpful
>>>> to our
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> There is one outstanding comment about organization.  We have broken
>>>> each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
>>>> ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that
>>>> this
>>>> is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
>>>> between
>>>> technology options.  I agree with the comment, but it would be pretty
>>>> invasive to try a major rearrangement while people are live editing.
>>>> Therefore, I'm tempted to skip compliance with that request until
>>>> after
>>>> the C&S review.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This body part will be downloaded on demand.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sphenix-tracking-l mailing list
Sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l