sPHENIX tracking discussion

["Frawley, Anthony" <afrawley AT fsu.edu>]

Hmm. I did not realize that people were compiling using the server. That does 
not seem to be very efficient.

I just tried again and failed, so I give up.

I have fleshed out the silicon tracking simulations section and updated the 
figures. I will try again to check it in tomorrow.

Tony 
________________________________________
From: Itaru Nakagawa [itaru AT bnl.gov]
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 12:12 AM
To: John Haggerty; Frawley, Anthony; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

Hi Tony and all,

  I am done with the major edition. From now on the edition will be minor,
so I don't need to compile too often.

Regards,
-itaru

On 2015/10/17 13:10, John Haggerty wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I find that their rendering engine making a new preview can make it
> impossible to get through the git bridge, and I reported to them an
> instance where the git bridge got hung and wouldn't let me in at all.
> Sometimes I find waiting a while helps.
>
> As far as I can see, it always works to upload the file to the site
> where you right click on a file or director and "Upload from computer"
> although it seems retro.
>
> I'm thinking we're saturating their site with changes to a large
> document.
>
> On 10/17/15 12:04 AM, Frawley, Anthony wrote:
>> I am having trouble pushing changes to the repository. Every time I
>> do a pull and then push, the push fails and I am told to do a pull
>> again - at which point I find new changes to the tracker section.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tony
>> ________________________________________
>> From: sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
>> [sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Itaru
>> Nakagawa [itaru AT bnl.gov]
>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 10:28 PM
>> To: John Haggerty; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>
>> It's getting late in east coast. Can I keep editing another 1.5 hours?
>> -itaru
>>
>> On 2015/10/17 11:22, John Haggerty wrote:
>>> Itaru,
>>>
>>> No, I'm doing some editing on other chapters, type away and let me
>>> know when you're done.
>>>
>>> On 10/16/15 10:10 PM, Itaru Nakagawa wrote:
>>>> Hi John,
>>>>    Have you released the draft already?
>>>> I am wondering if I still have a chance to modify the draft.
>>>> I am in the middle of edition and planning to work at least next a
>>>> couple of hours.
>>>> -itaru
>>>>
>>>> On 2015/10/16 10:39, John Haggerty wrote:
>>>>> I agree the organization could be better, and it's really up to you
>>>>> guys
>>>>> what's easier, but it seems to me a higher priority to get as much
>>>>> factual information in the document as possible and reorganize it
>>>>> later,
>>>>> so that we have in front of us as much information as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/15/15 8:46 PM, Yasuyuki Akiba wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Tony and all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If someone takes the edit token to do so, the reorganization can be
>>>>>> done
>>>>>> in one hour or so. It is just to move the exiting subsections.
>>>>>> Once it
>>>>>> is done, it would be much easier to edit each of the subsections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                  Y. Akiba
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:*Frawley, Anthony [mailto:afrawley AT fsu.edu]
>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:41 PM
>>>>>> *To:* Yasuyuki Akiba <akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
>>>>>> hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> *Cc:* Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Al,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think reorganizing would be a bad idea right now. The silicon
>>>>>> tracker
>>>>>> description and simulations need a lot of work, and I don't think we
>>>>>> have the option of not doing it. I am running some simulations, and
>>>>>> I am
>>>>>> just now starting to edit the silicon parts of the tracker section.
>>>>>> So I
>>>>>> agree with Tom - let's focus on completing it, and reorganize it
>>>>>> later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>>>> [sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Yasuyuki
>>>>>> Akiba
>>>>>> [akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:02 PM
>>>>>> *To:* hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu
>>>>>> <mailto:hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>;
>>>>>> sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Tom and all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ØThere is one outstanding comment about organization. We have broken
>>>>>> each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations,
>>>>>> R&D,
>>>>>> ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
>>>>>> between
>>>>>> technology options. I agree with the comment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also agree with the comment. The current organization is crazy. We
>>>>>> should change it immediately. I think someone should take the edit
>>>>>> token
>>>>>> now and re-arrange the section so that each technology has one
>>>>>> continuous subsection. Any volunteer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                  Y. Akiba
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>>>> [mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] *On Behalf Of
>>>>>> *Thomas
>>>>>> K Hemmick
>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:19 PM
>>>>>> *To:* sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>>>> *Subject:* [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have responded to most of the comments from PMG regarding the TPC
>>>>>> sections of the tracking chapter.  Explicitly these include comments
>>>>>> about available manpower and experience with MAPS detectors.
>>>>>> Both of
>>>>>> these comments enhance the document since the answers are helpful
>>>>>> to our
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is one outstanding comment about organization.  We have broken
>>>>>> each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations,
>>>>>> R&D,
>>>>>> ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
>>>>>> between
>>>>>> technology options.  I agree with the comment, but it would be
>>>>>> pretty
>>>>>> invasive to try a major rearrangement while people are live editing.
>>>>>> Therefore, I'm tempted to skip compliance with that request until
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> the C&S review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This body part will be downloaded on demand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sphenix-tracking-l mailing list
>> Sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l
>>
>
>