sPHENIX tracking discussion

[John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>]

Itaru,

No, I'm doing some editing on other chapters, type away and let me know 
when you're done.

On 10/16/15 10:10 PM, Itaru Nakagawa wrote:
> Hi John,
>   Have you released the draft already?
> I am wondering if I still have a chance to modify the draft.
> I am in the middle of edition and planning to work at least next a
> couple of hours.
> -itaru
>
> On 2015/10/16 10:39, John Haggerty wrote:
> > I agree the organization could be better, and it's really up to you guys
> > what's easier, but it seems to me a higher priority to get as much
> > factual information in the document as possible and reorganize it later,
> > so that we have in front of us as much information as possible.
> >
> > On 10/15/15 8:46 PM, Yasuyuki Akiba wrote:
> > > Dear Tony and all,
> > >
> > > If someone takes the edit token to do so, the reorganization can be done
> > > in one hour or so. It is just to move the exiting subsections. Once it
> > > is done, it would be much easier to edit each of the subsections.
> > >
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > >
> > >                 Y. Akiba
> > >
> > > *From:*Frawley, Anthony [mailto:afrawley AT fsu.edu]
> > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:41 PM
> > > *To:* Yasuyuki Akiba <akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> > > hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > *Cc:* Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
> > > *Subject:* RE: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
> > >
> > > Hi Al,
> > >
> > > I think reorganizing would be a bad idea right now. The silicon tracker
> > > description and simulations need a lot of work, and I don't think we
> > > have the option of not doing it. I am running some simulations, and I am
> > > just now starting to edit the silicon parts of the tracker section. So I
> > > agree with Tom - let's focus on completing it, and reorganize it later.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > [sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Yasuyuki Akiba
> > > [akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
> > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:02 PM
> > > *To:* hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu
> > > <mailto:hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>;
> > > sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > *Subject:* Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
> > >
> > > Dear Tom and all,
> > >
> > > ØThere is one outstanding comment about organization.  We have broken
> > > each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
> > > ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that this
> > > is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth between
> > > technology options. I agree with the comment
> > >
> > > I also agree with the comment. The current organization is crazy. We
> > > should change it immediately. I think someone should take the edit token
> > > now and re-arrange the section so that each technology has one
> > > continuous subsection. Any volunteer?
> > >
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > >
> > >                 Y. Akiba
> > >
> > > *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > [mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] *On Behalf Of *Thomas
> > > K Hemmick
> > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:19 PM
> > > *To:* sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > *Subject:* [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
> > >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I have responded to most of the comments from PMG regarding the TPC
> > > sections of the tracking chapter.  Explicitly these include comments
> > > about available manpower and experience with MAPS detectors.  Both of
> > > these comments enhance the document since the answers are helpful to our
> > > case.
> > >
> > > There is one outstanding comment about organization.  We have broken
> > > each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
> > > ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that this
> > > is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth between
> > > technology options.  I agree with the comment, but it would be pretty
> > > invasive to try a major rearrangement while people are live editing.
> > > Therefore, I'm tempted to skip compliance with that request until after
> > > the C&S review.
> > >
> > > Comments?
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This body part will be downloaded on demand.


--
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358