sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

From: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
To: "Frawley, Anthony" <afrawley AT fsu.edu>, Itaru Nakagawa <itaru AT bnl.gov>, "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 00:10:36 -0400

Tony,

I find that their rendering engine making a new preview can make it impossible to get through the git bridge, and I reported to them an instance where the git bridge got hung and wouldn't let me in at all. Sometimes I find waiting a while helps.

As far as I can see, it always works to upload the file to the site where you right click on a file or director and "Upload from computer" although it seems retro.

I'm thinking we're saturating their site with changes to a large document.

On 10/17/15 12:04 AM, Frawley, Anthony wrote:

I am having trouble pushing changes to the repository. Every time I do a pull
and then push, the push fails and I am told to do a pull again - at which
point I find new changes to the tracker section.

Any suggestions?

Thanks
Tony
________________________________________
From: sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
[sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Itaru Nakagawa
[itaru AT bnl.gov]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 10:28 PM
To: John Haggerty; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

It's getting late in east coast. Can I keep editing another 1.5 hours?
-itaru

On 2015/10/17 11:22, John Haggerty wrote:

Itaru,

No, I'm doing some editing on other chapters, type away and let me
know when you're done.

On 10/16/15 10:10 PM, Itaru Nakagawa wrote:

Hi John,
Have you released the draft already?
I am wondering if I still have a chance to modify the draft.
I am in the middle of edition and planning to work at least next a
couple of hours.
-itaru

On 2015/10/16 10:39, John Haggerty wrote:

I agree the organization could be better, and it's really up to you
guys
what's easier, but it seems to me a higher priority to get as much
factual information in the document as possible and reorganize it
later,
so that we have in front of us as much information as possible.

On 10/15/15 8:46 PM, Yasuyuki Akiba wrote:

Dear Tony and all,

If someone takes the edit token to do so, the reorganization can be
done
in one hour or so. It is just to move the exiting subsections. Once it
is done, it would be much easier to edit each of the subsections.

Sincerely yours,

Y. Akiba

*From:*Frawley, Anthony [mailto:afrawley AT fsu.edu]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:41 PM
*To:* Yasuyuki Akiba <akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
*Cc:* Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
*Subject:* RE: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

Hi Al,

I think reorganizing would be a bad idea right now. The silicon
tracker
description and simulations need a lot of work, and I don't think we
have the option of not doing it. I am running some simulations, and
I am
just now starting to edit the silicon parts of the tracker section.
So I
agree with Tom - let's focus on completing it, and reorganize it
later.

Tony

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
<mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
[sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Yasuyuki Akiba
[akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:02 PM
*To:* hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu
<mailto:hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>;
sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
<mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
*Subject:* Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

Dear Tom and all,

ØThere is one outstanding comment about organization. We have broken
each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
...) into pieces; one for each technology. There is a comment that
this
is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
between
technology options. I agree with the comment

I also agree with the comment. The current organization is crazy. We
should change it immediately. I think someone should take the edit
token
now and re-arrange the section so that each technology has one
continuous subsection. Any volunteer?

Sincerely yours,

Y. Akiba

*From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
<mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
[mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] *On Behalf Of
*Thomas
K Hemmick
*Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:19 PM
*To:* sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
<mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
*Subject:* [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.

Hi all

I have responded to most of the comments from PMG regarding the TPC
sections of the tracking chapter. Explicitly these include comments
about available manpower and experience with MAPS detectors. Both of
these comments enhance the document since the answers are helpful
to our
case.

There is one outstanding comment about organization. We have broken
each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, R&D,
...) into pieces; one for each technology. There is a comment that
this
is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
between
technology options. I agree with the comment, but it would be pretty
invasive to try a major rearrangement while people are live editing.
Therefore, I'm tempted to skip compliance with that request until
after
the C&S review.

Comments?

Tom

This body part will be downloaded on demand.

_______________________________________________
Sphenix-tracking-l mailing list
Sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l

--
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358

Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG. , (continued)