sPHENIX tracking discussion

[Itaru Nakagawa <itaru AT bnl.gov>]

Hi John,
I am done with the edition. Thanks for waiting.
Regards,
-itaru

On 2015/10/17 11:37, John Haggerty wrote:
> Itaru,
>
> Sure, if I run out of energy, I'll send it around in the morning. That 
> way, the sun will never set on sPHENIX.
>
> On 10/16/15 10:28 PM, Itaru Nakagawa wrote:
> > It's getting late in east coast. Can I keep editing another 1.5 hours?
> > -itaru
> >
> > On 2015/10/17 11:22, John Haggerty wrote:
> > > Itaru,
> > >
> > > No, I'm doing some editing on other chapters, type away and let me
> > > know when you're done.
> > >
> > > On 10/16/15 10:10 PM, Itaru Nakagawa wrote:
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >   Have you released the draft already?
> > > > I am wondering if I still have a chance to modify the draft.
> > > > I am in the middle of edition and planning to work at least next a
> > > > couple of hours.
> > > > -itaru
> > > >
> > > > On 2015/10/16 10:39, John Haggerty wrote:
> > > > > I agree the organization could be better, and it's really up to you
> > > > > guys
> > > > > what's easier, but it seems to me a higher priority to get as much
> > > > > factual information in the document as possible and reorganize it
> > > > > later,
> > > > > so that we have in front of us as much information as possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/15/15 8:46 PM, Yasuyuki Akiba wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Tony and all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If someone takes the edit token to do so, the reorganization can be
> > > > > > done
> > > > > > in one hour or so. It is just to move the exiting subsections. 
> > > > > > Once it
> > > > > > is done, it would be much easier to edit each of the subsections.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sincerely yours,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                 Y. Akiba
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *From:*Frawley, Anthony [mailto:afrawley AT fsu.edu]
> > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:41 PM
> > > > > > *To:* Yasuyuki Akiba <akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> > > > > > hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > *Cc:* Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
> > > > > > *Subject:* RE: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Al,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think reorganizing would be a bad idea right now. The silicon
> > > > > > tracker
> > > > > > description and simulations need a lot of work, and I don't think we
> > > > > > have the option of not doing it. I am running some simulations, and
> > > > > > I am
> > > > > > just now starting to edit the silicon parts of the tracker section.
> > > > > > So I
> > > > > > agree with Tom - let's focus on completing it, and reorganize it
> > > > > > later.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tony
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > > > > [sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] on behalf of Yasuyuki 
> > > > > > Akiba
> > > > > > [akiba AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
> > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:02 PM
> > > > > > *To:* hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu
> > > > > > <mailto:hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>;
> > > > > > sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Tom and all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ØThere is one outstanding comment about organization. We have broken
> > > > > > each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, 
> > > > > > R&D,
> > > > > > ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
> > > > > > between
> > > > > > technology options. I agree with the comment
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also agree with the comment. The current organization is crazy. We
> > > > > > should change it immediately. I think someone should take the edit
> > > > > > token
> > > > > > now and re-arrange the section so that each technology has one
> > > > > > continuous subsection. Any volunteer?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sincerely yours,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                 Y. Akiba
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *From:*sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > > > > [mailto:sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] *On Behalf Of
> > > > > > *Thomas
> > > > > > K Hemmick
> > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:19 PM
> > > > > > *To:* sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > <mailto:sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > > > > > *Subject:* [Sphenix-tracking-l] Responding to Comments from PMG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have responded to most of the comments from PMG regarding the TPC
> > > > > > sections of the tracking chapter.  Explicitly these include comments
> > > > > > about available manpower and experience with MAPS detectors.  
> > > > > > Both of
> > > > > > these comments enhance the document since the answers are helpful
> > > > > > to our
> > > > > > case.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is one outstanding comment about organization.  We have broken
> > > > > > each section (description, justification, schedule, simulations, 
> > > > > > R&D,
> > > > > > ...) into pieces; one for each technology.  There is a comment that
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > is tough on the reader since they continually move back & forth
> > > > > > between
> > > > > > technology options.  I agree with the comment, but it would be 
> > > > > > pretty
> > > > > > invasive to try a major rearrangement while people are live editing.
> > > > > > Therefore, I'm tempted to skip compliance with that request until
> > > > > > after
> > > > > > the C&S review.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Comments?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This body part will be downloaded on demand.