STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Tanmay,

Thank you for updating your slides.
I don't have further comments but you can address Helen and other's 
comment in startalk discussion.

I sign off.

Cheers
Nihar

On 2023-03-24 23:32, Tanmay Pani via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi Barabra and all,
>
> Thank you for your nice comments, they have been implemented here:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP2023.pdf
>
> The slide 19 contains the jet pt ratio plots between pythia8 and 6
>
> Please have a look and give any suggestions for that slide, should I
> keep it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Tanmay
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Barbara Trzeciak
> <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tanmay,
> >
> > thanks for the update, please see my comments below.
> >
> > - Change the data to your talks' date
> > - s5: move "ALICE, JHEP 10 .." text up and the ALICE g plot down, so
> > that all the ALICE plots are in one line
> > - s10: cpT,trk -> pT,trk
> > - s11: Analysis TL;DR -> Analysis
> > Try to shorten the text on this slide, e.g.
> > After calculating the jet observables, embedding simulation used for
> > deconvoluting detector effects by mapping RECO → GEN ->
> > Deconvoluting detector effects by mapping RECO → GEN using
> > embedding simulation
> >
> > For p D T , LeSub and Girth, said deconvolution achieved using 2D -
> > Iterative bayesian unfolding of -> p D T , LeSub and Girth: 2D -
> > Iterative bayesian unfolding of
> >
> > Both deconvolution tactics passes closure tests -> Both
> > deconvolution tactics pass closure tests (and you don't need the
> > rest, put details to the backup)
> >
> > - s13: move PYTHIA-8 conclusion adobe the plot, use bullets (also on
> > other slides)
> > - s17, 18: use thicker lines for PYTHIA-8 predictions on pTD, LeSub
> > and g plots, same as you have on the r plots.
> > - s18: Here we discussed that even pure QJ PYTHIA 8 doesn't describe
> > the shape. Have you compared the PYTHIA 6 and PYTHIA 8 pT
> > distributions so that we can fine tune the conclusions ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Barbara
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:53 AM Tanmay Pani via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nihar, Barbara and Yi,
> >
> > Thanks for your nice comments. Here is an updated version.
> >
> > HP2023.pdf [1]
> >
> > After few rehearsal runs, I decided to cut out most of the finer
> > analysis details, as I was routinely clocking in over 20 minutes
> > with those in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tanmay
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 12:15 AM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tanmay,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the nice slides. I have some minor comments for
> > your consideration.
> > - p6, p7: Title, Previous measurements from LHC
> > - p16, p23: If you don't have enough time, I would move these
> > slides to backup
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 5:24 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Tanmay Pani (tp543 AT physics.rutgers.edu) has submitted a material for
> > a
> > review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63055
> >
> > Deadline: 2023-03-26
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>  _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP2023_0.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l