Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang for HP2024 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Cc: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang for HP2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:04:25 +0900

Dear Nihar,

Hello, thank you for the comments.
I applied most of your comments in the new version. Please find my new version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_poster_v2.pdf)

Also, I keep thinking about your comment regarding 'Flow chart'.

>_Flow chart: -> The need of this flow chart is not clear at this stage. I think you can make a flow chart of your analysis procedure.

One of the main purposes of this poster is to show the status of the on-going analysis, and at this stage, I believe it is better to keep the current flow chart.


Thank you,
Jeongmyung

2024-09-15 16:12에 Nihar Sahoo이(가) 쓴 내용:
Hello Jeongmyung,

Please find my comments on your nice poster.


Introduction:

_Particularly dominant contribution in low pT,jet region -> you need
to mention what Pt,jet range you are indicating. Low pT,jet < 5 GeV/c
is that you mean.
_Challenges in central heavy-ion collisions -> Challenges in heavy-ion
collisions
_ E.g. -> e. g.
_pT spectra down to very low pT,jet -> Please mention what is that
"very low pT" ?
_pT,trigger -> need to define

_Searching parton virtuality evolution in central heavy- ion
collisions -> Studying parton virtuality evolution in central heavy-
ion collisions
_ virtuality evolution -> it would be better to mention what is
"virtuality evolution"?
_ Please mention Why do we need to study virtuality evolution in
heavy-ion collisions?


Analysis Details:
_Flow chart: -> The need of this flow chart is not clear at this
stage. I think you can make a flow chart of your analysis procedure.

_"Data set" -> As you are not using any data, so you just mention
"Simulated events"
_200 GeV pp collisions -> You need to mention what type of event
sample you have generated. Is it non-trigger (no-Bias) or triggered
events for this study ( like high pT hadron, gamma, pi0 trigger
events)
_"Thermal background" -> Need to explain what is thermal background?

Results:

_ You need to mention what are SE and ME ?
_ In response matrices, you have not mentioned, what effect you have
implanted to create this response matrix? Like detector effects,
and/or heavy-ion background fluctuations effect.
_ Corrected recoil jet yield spectra -> You need to mention what
correction you are implementing (see above comment).

In conclusion:
You need to mention also outlook of this study.


Best
Nihar







On 2024-09-14 09:59, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Jeongmyung Kang (jeongmyung.kang AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68922

Deadline: 2024-09-22
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page