star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
- From: 董家宁 <jndong AT sdu.edu.cn>
- To: gerard visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
- Cc: star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:54:52 +0800
Hi Gerard,
Thanks for the careful checking.
The schematic for the outer hybrid and inner hybrid are updated and upload
to the WIKI. (https://wiki.bnl.gov/star/index.php/Hybrid_and_T-board)
For the layout, please let me know if you see any inconsistency.
Best,
Jianing
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Zhenyu Ye" <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>
> 发送时间: 2019-11-10 14:45:08 (星期日)
> 收件人: "Gerard Visser" <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
> 抄送: "董家宁" <jndong AT sdu.edu.cn>, star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> 主题: Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019
>
> Gerard, thanks for looking into this.
>
> > On Nov 7, 2019, at 11:48 PM, Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu> wrote:
> >
> > hi Jianing,
> > I checked the schematics
> >
> > outer hybrid
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/hybrid_outer_v2_3-schematic_0.pdf
> >
> > inner hybrid
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/hybrid_inner_v2_1-schematic.pdf
> >
> > T-board
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/T-Board_v3-schematic.pdf
> >
> > I think everything looks correct in these. One minor point is that we
> > probably have to change the resistor values (on T-board and on hybrids)
> > to have less reflection on the CLK and TRG lines. The cable has a
> > characteristic impedance (differential) of around 100 to 110 Ohms. (It
> > isn't very precisely controlled, we should measure it when we have the
> > cable, but it will be around that value. So we should make the input
> > impedance of T-board and hybrids assembly around 100-110 Ohms. I suggest
> > changing the resistors R1, R2 on outer hybrid and on inner hybrid from
> > 49.9 to 78.7 Ohm,
>
> Jianing, if the proposed changes are fine to you. can you please update the
> hybrids schematics accordingly?
>
> Yi, I understand that a company has assembled 6 inner hybrids w/o obvious
> issue, but with the 49.9 Oh for R1/R2. Can they change them?
>
> > and the leaving the resistors R9, R10, R11, R12 on the T-board at 33.2
> > Ohm. Final values have to be confirmed after all the boards and cable are
> > available for a scope measurement. At that time we _might_ decide to
> > change the value on T-board; the 78.7 Ohm on hybrids is very likely to be
> > fine (and is of course a lot more trouble to modify on existing boards,
> > so we won't want to do that).
> > [FYI in IST from the documents at
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/yezhenyu/forward-silicon-tracker-ist
> > the naively calculated input impedance 166 Ohms which is not right. I am
> > not sure why, perhaps the documents are not really all correct. I think
> > Ben did look at CLK & TRG waveforms with a scope and optimize these,
> > although I don't have any record of it.]
> > I will have a look at new outer hybrid layout for electrical / layout
> > issues only -- not for mechanical interface issues -- but I expect no
> > problems, it will look nice as the prior version did.
>
> Gerard, it will be great if you can look at the new outer hybrid layout for
> electrical / layout issues asap, so that we can move forward with the new
> hybrid production. This has now become the bottleneck of the project.
>
> Best,
> Zhenyu
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gerard
> >
> >
> > On 10/31/2019 10:22 PM, 董家宁 wrote:
> >> Hi Gerard,
> >> Thanks for your help.
> >> There are no changes on the connector part.
> >> Please let me know if you need any other files.
> >> Thanks!
> >> Best,
> >> Jianing
> >>> -----原始邮件-----
> >>> 发件人: "Gerard Visser" <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
> >>> 发送时间: 2019-11-01 10:14:39 (星期五)
> >>> 收件人: star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>> 抄送:
> >>> 主题: Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019
> >>>
> >>> hi Jianing, Zhenyu,
> >>> Somebody was going to document (simply with a picture or two) how
> >>> that the
> >>> connector tab of outer (particularly) hybrid fits well to the T-board on
> >>> mechanical structure. I think we should see this before the new outer
> >>> hybrid is
> >>> ordered. (Is there any change in this aspect of the new outer hybrid? I
> >>> understood no change.)
> >>> Meanwhile, yes it is in my inbox to check the electrical aspects, I
> >>> will try to
> >>> have that done by early next week.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Gerard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/31/2019 10:04 PM, 董家宁 wrote:
> >>>> Dear All,
> >>>>
> >>>> 2.Hybrid, T-board:
> >>>>
> >>>> With the help of Mike and Gerard, the address connection for the
> >>>> temperature
> >>>> sensor chip on outer hybrid is modified and updated.
> >>>>
> >>>> And the schematic for T-board v3.0 is also updated (keep one set of
> >>>> temperature sensor and reset circuit).
> >>>>
> >>>> I think they are all waiting for the double check.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there are no other mistakes for outer hybrid layout, it will
> >>>> take about 3
> >>>> weeks for the production.
> >>>>
> >>>> All the detailed status are listed on the WIKI
> >>>> (https://wiki.bnl.gov/star/index.php/Hybrid_and_T-board).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jianing
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----原始邮件-----
> >>>> *发件人:*"Capotosto, Michael" <capotosto AT bnl.gov>
> >>>> *发送时间:*2019-11-01 05:43:15 (星期五)
> >>>> *收件人:* "Ye, Zhenyu" <yezhenyu AT uic.edu>, "star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov"
> >>>> <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> >>>> *抄送:*
> >>>> *主题:* Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019
> >>>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> As discussed last meeting, I’ve compiled the documentation and
> >>>> posted it to
> >>>> the wiki: https://wiki.bnl.gov/star/index.php/Cables
> >>>>
> >>>> T-Board/Inner Signal Cable:
> >>>>
> >>>> Last meeting we agreed we would use the IST-type of cables, due to
> >>>> cost. It
> >>>> turns out I misinterpreted the quote – we were quoted for 400ft of
> >>>> cable but
> >>>> they had a minimum 1,000ft order. It is cheaper as Gerard expected
> >>>> to use
> >>>> the Polypropylene/PVC/PVC cable. I’m waiting to hear back from
> >>>> Gerard on how
> >>>> he’d like to proceed. The updated quotes binder mentioned can be
> >>>> found here:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Cable%20Quotes%20Binder%2010-28-2019.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Cable%20Quotes%20Binder%2010-28-2019.pdf>
> >>>> The quotes binder also includes new updated (non-expired) quotes,
> >>>> so once we
> >>>> have a decision we can order the cables. (Elke/Gerard/Zhenyu, will
> >>>> this be
> >>>> on one of the BNL accounts, or will I be sending this to someone
> >>>> else? If it
> >>>> will be on a BNL account I can start drafting the PO so it will be
> >>>> ready to
> >>>> send when we make a final decision).
> >>>>
> >>>> Regarding the V2.1 T-Board modifications, I believe we just need
> >>>> to remove a
> >>>> handful of parts to in order to make it work, I’ve discussed this
> >>>> in an
> >>>> email with Jianing and Gerard, and am waiting to hear back from
> >>>> Gerard. I
> >>>> will have the cables re-labeled tonight before I leave (to match
> >>>> the VIA REF
> >>>> DES used in V2.1 T-Boards we are assembling). Once Gerard gives me
> >>>> the O.K.
> >>>> I’ll pull the parts off the boards, and we should be able to give
> >>>> them to
> >>>> the assembler within a working day or two. If there are no
> >>>> objections, I
> >>>> will extend the due date for the vendor to November 29.
> >>>>
> >>>> If I’ve missed any points please let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike Capotosto
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Star-fst-l mailing list
> >>> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fst-l mailing list
> > Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Gerard Visser, 11/07/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Zhenyu Ye, 11/10/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019, 董家宁, 11/10/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Gerard Visser, 11/14/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Gerard Visser, 11/14/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019, Zhenyu Ye, 11/14/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
董家宁, 11/15/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Gerard Visser, 11/25/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
董家宁, 11/26/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019, Gerard Visser, 11/26/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Ye, Zhenyu, 11/26/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019, 董家宁, 11/26/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
董家宁, 11/26/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Gerard Visser, 11/25/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Gerard Visser, 11/14/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Weekly FST meeting - 10/31/2019,
Zhenyu Ye, 11/10/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.