star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
- From: zli1 <zli1 AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 20:39:36 +0800
Hello Nihar,
Thanks for your nice comments, I upload a new version. Please have a look.
By the way, I can only edit the file in this link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61422
This proceeding is limited in 6 pages, now it is over the limit a bit. I think I could reduce the words after other comments.
L13:add "such as the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME), anisotropic charmonium production, spin-charge correlation for final-state hadrons, and so on."
L14:rephrased: "However, there is a lack of experimental measurements of the proprieties of the EM fields."
L27: add "In total, an integrated luminosity of 14.2 $\rm nb^{-1}$ was sampled by the dimuon trigger." (and the integrated luminosity of MB trigger used in dimuon analysis is 0.2 nb^{-1}, I'm not sure if it is also needed to list here)
L33: rephrased: "The low mass di-muon (0.4<$\rm M_{\mu\mu$<0.64 GeV/$c^{2}$) and the J/$\psi$ (2.9<$\rm M_{\mu\mu$<3.2 GeV/$c^{2}$) production are analysed separately."
Best,
Ziyang
On 2022-11-09 19:59, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l wrote:
Hello Ziyang,
Please find my comments on your nice proceedings.
GeV/c -> GeV/$c$ (all places)
p+p -> $p+p$
Abstract Line 10: "In this contribution, we present recent …" -> "We
present the recent…"
"...and its physical implications…" -> "... , and its implication is discussed."
L12: "…fields can be induced …" -> " …fields are induced…"
L12: "In heavy-ion collisions, … the relativistic heavy ions " -> "In
the relativistic heavy-ion collisions, … the heavy ions "
L13:"… various interesting phenomena …" -> "… various
interesting
phenomena, like " Mention what are those "interesting phenomena"?
L14: ", while there is a lack of clear experimental measurements of
the strength and spatial of the EM fields." -> Not clear. Please
rephrase it and make a separate sentence.
L15-16: "…, leading to photon-induced interactions []" -> remove comma.
L17: "significant enhancements of…" -> "a significant enhancement of
dilepton pairs and the J/shi…"
L23:"The measurements of very low 𝑝T vector meson and dilepton
production in peripheral heavy-ion collisions …" -> "The measurements
of the vector meson and dilepton production at very low pT in
peripheral events…"
L24: "to study photoproduction in collisions" -> "to study the
photoproduction in heavy-ion collisions"
L25: " and smaller impact parameters " -> "…and relatively smaller
impact parameters.."
"It also provide …" -> "It also provides information of the strength
and the spatial distribution of the EM fields produced in these
collisions."
L27: " In 2014, the STAR experiment recorded large samples of Au+Au
collisions at √𝑠NN =200GeV. " -> "The STAR experiment recorded the
large sample of datasets in Au+Au collisions at √𝑠NN =200GeV in 2014.
" Please provide lumi. of your dataset to support your "large sample
data"
L28: "In this contribution, we will present new measurements …" ->"In
this proceeding, we present the new measurements of the dilepton and
the J/shi production at very low pT in peripheral collisions…"
L30:"…𝑝T and 𝑝2T will be shown. " -> " 𝑝T, and 𝑝2T are shown."
L30-31:" Physical implications will also be discussed together with
model comparisons. " -> "Different models are compared to the data and
their implications are finally discussed."
L33: "This contribution…" -> what contribution? In the previous
sentence, you have already discussed about dataset and 2014. Please
rephrase this.
L35:"For J/𝜓, " -> "for the J/𝜓 measurement,…"
L37: "… (MTD)[9]. (2) For…" -> "… (MTD)[9], (2) for…." (There should
be "comma" after 1st bullet)
L38:"… minimub-bias trigger events …" -> " minimub-bias events "
L39:"Time of flight" -> "Time-of-Flight"
L40:"…candidates from the same event are paired …" ->"…candidates,
from the same event, are paired …"
L41:"mass spectra, the combinatorial background is …" -> "…mass
spectra. The combinatorial background is…"
L42 and 43: "mixed-events" -> "the mixed-events"; "from same-events"
->"from the same-events"
L45: "obtained, while the J/shi…" -> "obtained. The J/shi…"
"the maximum likelihood method." ->Give reference
L49: "Data points are fitted by Tsallis function … -> "The data points
are fitted by the Tsallis function …"
"… significant enhancement …" -> (Make another sentence) "Significant…."
L50-51: "To quantify the J/shi production modification in hadronic
A+A…" -> "To quantify the relative suppression of J/shi production in
Au+Au …"
L52: "… , Which is defined as …" -> (Make a new sentence) "It is defined as,"
Eq1: Define what are enumerator, denominator, N_coll?
L53-54: "A large enhancement of 𝑅𝐴𝐴 above unity …" -> "A large
enhancement of the J/shi yield in peripheral collisions relative to
the $p+p$ collisions is observed. It strongly suggests the excess
J/shi yield is due to the photon-induced production in peripheral
collisions."
L59: "…shows J/𝜓 yields …" -> "…shows the J/𝜓 yields …"
N_{part} -> $N_{\rm part}$
L70: "EPA-QED calculations …" -> "The EPA-QED calculations …"
L71: "….that 𝑝T …" -> "… that the pT…"
L72." …impact parameter dependence and should be considered. " ->
"… impact parameter dependence." (Rest not needed)
L75: "for comparison. EPA-QED…" -> "…for the comparison. The EPA-QED…"
L76: "STARlight …" ->"The STARlight…" ; "data" -> "the data"
L82:" In this contribution, measurements …" -> "The measurements …"
L85:"The results are compatible with the theoretical calculations with
EPA, show the enhancements …" -> "The data are comparable with the EPA
calculations indicating the enhancements … "
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-10-23 20:46, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,_______________________________________________
Ziyang Li (lzy9404 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61423
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/09/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
zli1, 11/11/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/14/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/15/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 11/15/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
zli1, 11/17/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/18/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 11/18/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
zli1, 11/17/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/14/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
zli1, 11/11/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.