Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov>
  • To: zli1 <zli1 AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Ziyang Li for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 22:02:20 -0800

Hi Ziyang,
   Thanks for implementing the suggestions. I dont have further comments and sign off

thanks
Sooraj

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:29 PM zli1 via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Sooraj and Yi,

Thanks for your useful comments, I upload a new version v2 on drupal.

Based on Sooraj's comments, in addition to the modified text,
I rewrite sec 2
I adjust the order of figures and corresponding discussions in sec 3.2,
now they follow pT,pT^2, and mass distribution.

Based on Yi's comments, in addition to the modified text,
I think dielectron is better, thank you! And I changed dimuon to mu+
mu-, except in the title and dimuon trigger.
  - L31: In this proceeding   Sorry, I didn't catch your meaning.
L76, since I adjust the order, so the references are still in the same
position.

Best,
Ziyang
On 2022-11-16 11:23, Yi Yang wrote:
> Hi Ziyang,
>
> Thanks a lot for the nice proceedings. I have some minor comments for
> your consideration.
>   - General: the order of you references are strange, it starts with
> [11, 12] in L16
>                    dielectron or di-electron, you have to pick one and
> make it consistent over the whole article (many places).
>                    change dimuon to mu+ mu- ?
>   - L10: implication is --> implications are
>   - L31: In this proceeding
>   - L33: pT and pT^2 --> pT, and pT^2
>   - L40: [10], (2) --> [10]; (2)
>   - L42: add a space in front of [9]
>   - L43: I would suggest to rewrite this sentence to something like
> (Just for your consideration....): "The combinatorial background is
> estimated using the unlike-sign distribution from mixed-events.
> However, in the low mass regions, since the correlated backgrounds are
> not negligible and can not be reproduced by the mixed-event method,
> the dimuon like-sign distributio  from the same-events is used to
> remove the backgrounds."
>   - Eq(1): add a comma in the end,
>   - L56: Where --> where
>   - L76: Put references for EPA-QED and STARlight here, you can remove
> the ones in L80.
>
> Cheers,
> Yi
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yi Yang, Associate Professor
> Department of Physics /
> Director of Science Education Center
> National Cheng Kung University
> Tainan, 701 Taiwan
> E-Mail: yiyang AT ncku.edu.tw
> Tel: +886-6-2757575 ext.65237
> Fax: +886-6-2747995
> Group Web: http://phys.ncku.edu.tw/~yiyang [1]
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 8:41 PM zli1 via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hello Nihar,
>>
>> Thanks for your nice comments, I upload a new version. Please have a
>>
>> look.
>> By the way, I can only edit the file in this link:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61422
>>
>> This proceeding is limited in 6 pages, now it is over the limit a
>> bit. I
>> think I could reduce the words after other comments.
>>
>> L13:add "such as the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME), anisotropic
>> charmonium production, spin-charge correlation for final-state
>> hadrons,
>> and so on."
>> L14:rephrased: "However, there is a lack of experimental
>> measurements of
>> the proprieties of the EM fields."
>> L27: add "In total, an integrated luminosity of 14.2 $\rm nb^{-1}$
>> was
>> sampled by the dimuon trigger." (and the integrated luminosity of MB
>>
>> trigger used in dimuon analysis is 0.2 nb^{-1}, I'm not sure if it
>> is
>> also needed to list here)
>> L33: rephrased: "The low mass di-muon (0.4<$\rm M_{\mu\mu$<0.64
>> GeV/$c^{2}$) and the J/$\psi$ (2.9<$\rm M_{\mu\mu$<3.2 GeV/$c^{2}$)
>> production are analysed separately."
>>
>> Best,
>> Ziyang
>>
>> On 2022-11-09 19:59, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>> Hello Ziyang,
>>>
>>> Please find my comments on your nice proceedings.
>>>
>>> GeV/c -> GeV/$c$ (all places)
>>> p+p -> $p+p$
>>>
>>> Abstract Line 10: "In this contribution, we present recent …" ->
>> "We
>>> present the recent…"
>>> "...and its physical implications…" -> "... , and its
>> implication is
>>> discussed."
>>>
>>> L12: "…fields can be induced …" -> "  …fields are
>> induced…"
>>> L12: "In heavy-ion collisions, … the relativistic heavy ions "
>> -> "In
>>> the relativistic heavy-ion collisions, … the heavy ions "
>>> L13:"…                various interesting phenomena …" -> "…
>> various interesting
>>> phenomena, like " Mention what are those "interesting phenomena"?
>>> L14: ", while there is a lack of clear experimental measurements
>> of
>>> the strength and spatial of the EM fields." -> Not clear. Please
>>> rephrase it and make a separate sentence.
>>> L15-16: "…, leading to photon-induced  interactions []" ->
>> remove
>>> comma.
>>> L17: "significant enhancements of…" -> "a significant
>> enhancement of
>>> dilepton pairs and the J/shi…"
>>> L23:"The measurements of very low 𝑝T vector meson and dilepton
>>> production in peripheral heavy-ion collisions …" -> "The
>> measurements
>>> of the vector meson and dilepton production at very low pT in
>>> peripheral events…"
>>> L24: "to study photoproduction in collisions" -> "to study the
>>> photoproduction in heavy-ion collisions"
>>> L25: "                and smaller impact parameters " -> "…and
>> relatively smaller
>>> impact parameters.."
>>> "It also provide …" -> "It also provides information of the
>> strength
>>> and the spatial distribution of the EM fields produced in these
>>> collisions."
>>> L27: " In 2014, the STAR experiment recorded large samples of
>> Au+Au
>>> collisions at √𝑠NN =200GeV. " -> "The STAR experiment
>> recorded the
>>> large sample of datasets in Au+Au collisions at √𝑠NN =200GeV
>> in 2014.
>>> " Please provide lumi. of your dataset to support your "large
>> sample
>>> data"
>>> L28: "In this contribution, we will present new measurements …"
>> ->"In
>>> this proceeding, we present the new measurements of the dilepton
>> and
>>> the J/shi production at very low pT in peripheral collisions…"
>>> L30:"…𝑝T and 𝑝2T will be shown. " -> "              𝑝T,
>> and 𝑝2T are shown."
>>> L30-31:"      Physical  implications will also be discussed
>> together with
>>> model comparisons. " -> "Different models are compared to the data
>> and
>>> their implications are finally discussed."
>>>
>>>
>>> L33: "This contribution…" -> what contribution? In the previous
>>> sentence, you have already discussed about dataset and 2014.
>> Please
>>> rephrase this.
>>> L35:"For J/𝜓, " -> "for the J/𝜓 measurement,…"
>>> L37: "… (MTD)[9]. (2) For…" -> "… (MTD)[9], (2) for…."
>> (There should
>>> be "comma" after 1st bullet)
>>> L38:"…        minimub-bias trigger events …" -> "
>> minimub-bias events "
>>> L39:"Time of flight" -> "Time-of-Flight"
>>> L40:"…candidates from the same event are paired …"
>> ->"…candidates,
>>> from the same event, are paired …"
>>> L41:"mass spectra, the combinatorial background is …" ->
>> "…mass
>>> spectra. The combinatorial background is…"
>>> L42 and 43: "mixed-events" -> "the mixed-events";  "from
>> same-events"
>>> ->"from the same-events"
>>> L45: "obtained, while the J/shi…" -> "obtained. The J/shi…"
>>> "the maximum likelihood method." ->Give reference
>>>
>>> L49: "Data points are fitted by Tsallis function … -> "The data
>> points
>>> are fitted by the Tsallis function …"
>>> "… significant enhancement …" -> (Make another sentence)
>>> "Significant…."
>>> L50-51: "To quantify the J/shi production modification in hadronic
>>> A+A…" -> "To quantify the relative suppression of J/shi
>> production in
>>> Au+Au …"
>>> L52: "… , Which is defined as …" -> (Make a new sentence) "It
>> is
>>> defined as,"
>>> Eq1: Define what are enumerator, denominator, N_coll?
>>> L53-54: "A large enhancement of 𝑅𝐴𝐴 above unity …" ->
>> "A large
>>> enhancement of the J/shi yield in peripheral collisions relative
>> to
>>> the $p+p$ collisions is observed. It strongly suggests the excess
>>> J/shi yield is due to the photon-induced production in peripheral
>>> collisions."
>>> L59: "…shows J/𝜓 yields …" -> "…shows the J/𝜓 yields
>> …"
>>> N_{part} -> $N_{\rm part}$
>>>
>>> L70: "EPA-QED calculations …" -> "The EPA-QED calculations …"
>>> L71: "….that 𝑝T …" -> "… that the pT…"
>>> L72." …impact parameter dependence and should be considered. "
>> ->
>>> "…    impact parameter dependence." (Rest not needed)
>>>
>>> L75: "for comparison. EPA-QED…" -> "…for the comparison. The
>> EPA-QED…"
>>> L76: "STARlight …" ->"The STARlight…" ; "data" -> "the data"
>>> L82:" In this contribution, measurements …" -> "The measurements
>> …"
>>> L85:"The results are compatible with the theoretical calculations
>> with
>>> EPA, show the enhancements …" -> "The data are comparable with
>> the EPA
>>> calculations indicating the enhancements … "
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Nihar
>>>
>>> On 2022-10-23 20:46, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>>
>>>> Ziyang Li (lzy9404 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for
>> a
>>>> review,
>>>> please have a look:
>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61423
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://phys.ncku.edu.tw/*yiyang__;fg!!P4SdNyxKAPE!C3BXcV4ct08Tz-i4bT67EH1OWJbhMruRVYiAzz0gavY5S749kH64oHipjiXCV_I5TiUDmnuoHkk9iTOsDu7_jPwU$
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l


--
Sooraj Radhakrishnan
Research Scientist,
Department of Physics
Kent State University
Kent, OH 44243

Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate
Nuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
Berkeley, CA 94720
Ph: 510-495-2473



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page