star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
- From: Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov>
- To: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:32:06 -0800
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the updated version.
L27. Remove 'differently'. This should be a conclusion from the measurement, dont have to state ahead.
With that addressed, I sign off
thanks
Sooraj
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:05 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for addressing my additional comment. I sign off.
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-11-30 16:06, Andrew Tamis via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi Sooraj,
>
> Thank you for the comments.
> L22: Done
> L23: I removed the kinematic range
> L25: Removed ", a monte carlo event generator"
> L27: I removed the kinematic range, and rephrased the last sentence to
> "..., which will provide information about how the quark-gluon plasma
> interacts with the jet differently across the angular scales covered
> by the EEC." Please let me know if this sounds better.
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 8:26 PM Sooraj Radhakrishnan
> <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>> Thanks for preparing this nice abstract. Please find a few
>> comments from me below
>>
>> L22: in p+p collisions --> p+p collisions
>> L23: GeV/c (not as a fraction). Do you want to specify the kinematic
>> range in the abstract?
>> L25: I dont think you need to define PYTHIA6 for HP abstract
>> L27: scale dependence of the QGP doesnt read right, what do you
>> refer to here? Modification from QGP at different length/angular
>> scales? Should rephrase if so
>>
>> thanks
>> Sooraj
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 12:00 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>
>>> Thank you for implementing my comments.
>>> I have a few additional comments below.
>>>
>>> L6: "Other time information" Not clear what is other time besides
>>> "split
>>> formation time" ?
>>> L23: "The response of the EEC to selections on jet pT …. 15
>>> GeV/c to 50
>>> GeV/c" ->" The EEC of full jet pT will be shown in a kinematic
>>> range
>>> from 15 to 50 GeV/$\it c$ using the STAR barrel calorimeter
>>> detectors
>>> and time projection chamber. "
>>> L25: "… PYTHIA 6, a Monte Carlo event generator." -> "…
>>> PYTHIA-6." (If
>>> it is STAR tune, then mention it please)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Nihar
>>>
>>> On 2022-11-29 01:14, Andrew Tamis wrote:
>>>> Hello Barbara and Nihar
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the comments! I have implemented both of your
>>>> suggestions. I included split formation time as an example of
>>> time
>>>> information that soft drop and the lund plane extract. I have
>>> also
>>>> listed PYTHIA 6 as the monte carlo generator I am using for
>>>> comparisons.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if you have any more comments
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 6:07 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
>>>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find my comment on your nice abstract.
>>>>>
>>>>> L6: "extract time information " -> please mention what time
>>>>> information.
>>>>> Do you mean "formation time of parton shower" ?
>>>>> L12:"… jet evolution .." -> the jet evolution
>>>>> L14: "infrared and collinear " -> "infrared-and-collinear "
>>>>> L21: "data from" -> "the data from"; "in p+p collisions"
>>>>> L22: for the detector effect;
>>>>> "a Monte Carlo event generator " -> better to mention what are
>>>>> those
>>>>> generators or models?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please give some information how do you select jet in pp and
>>> what
>>>>> kinematic range you plan to present.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Nihar
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2022-11-21 10:58, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material
>>> for
>>>>> a
>>>>>> review,
>>>>>> please have a look:
>>>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61793
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deadline: 2022-12-05
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please
>>> contact
>>>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sooraj Radhakrishnan
>>
>> Research Scientist,
>> Department of Physics
>>
>> Kent State University
>> Kent, OH 44243
>>
>> Physicist Postdoctoral AffiliateNuclear Science Division
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
>> MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
>> Berkeley, CA 94720
>> Ph: 510-495-2473 [1]
>>
>> Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] tel:%28510%29%20495-2473
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Sooraj Radhakrishnan
Research Scientist,
Department of Physics
Kent State University
Kent, OH 44243
Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 11/21/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 11/25/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/27/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 11/28/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 11/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Andrew Tamis, 11/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 11/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Andrew Tamis for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Andrew Tamis, 11/28/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.